Have to say, I'm concerned that this Super Straight thing could be inadvertently turned into a trap. Normalize the idea of not being willing to date certain women as a specific offshoot sexuality of basic heterosexuality. Force normal people to effectively declare themselves "transphobic" to remain "straight". Then everyone will either conform, or out themselves as transphobes and be cancelled/attacked/fired/exiled and so on. Fine for a lot of people on sites like this, but your average every day person that wants to be left alone might have trouble.
It'd be one more thing the left could use to interrogate people.
"What's your sexuality?"
"Straight."
"So, not Super Straight?"
"Uh. N-n-nope...just straight."
"Good answer."
Next thing you know the left has the entire standard heterosexual gender chalked up as LGBT allies, and anyone else categorized as a problematic exception. Normal straight people become a minority - on paper at least. Not in reality, but it's easy narrative control for subversion I think. Guaranteed they'll even start referring to it as the SS and associate it with nazis.
Granted, this Super Straight meme probably won't go that far, but I could see this being used as a test run. Or maybe even if this meme does grow and catch on, enough people will associate themselves with it that nothing really changes.
Probably overthinking the whole thing. Or maybe I'm underthinking it in the wrong direction 🤔?
I think the primary difference here is that people who declare themselves super straight aren't mentally deranged like the rest of the alphabet mafia. They know that they're just doing it to poke a hole through the eyes of the gender plethora.
Normies aren't going to need to declare anything because they're followers anyway. By the time they even become aware of super straight the whole situation will probably have played out.
If it gets to the point where they're interrogating people (and I have little doubt it will, given the current course remains unchallenged) - then we're going to have much much bigger problems to deal with.
I wasn't really thinking of serious interrogations. Just using that word to refer to the lefty questioning they might do to force someone to take a stance. More commonly done to celebrities really - I don't know if they do it to ordinary people, although I have seen it on internet forums as well.
That aside, hopefully you're right and this all goes nowhere. My post is just intended to present the possible option that exists here. An option for the left to try to turn basic heterosexuality into a shamed minority (again - on paper, not in reality), identified by a lack of trans involvement. Thinking long term.
Have to say, I'm concerned that this Super Straight thing could be inadvertently turned into a trap. Normalize the idea of not being willing to date certain women as a specific offshoot sexuality of basic heterosexuality. Force normal people to effectively declare themselves "transphobic" to remain "straight". Then everyone will either conform, or out themselves as transphobes and be cancelled/attacked/fired/exiled and so on. Fine for a lot of people on sites like this, but your average every day person that wants to be left alone might have trouble.
It'd be one more thing the left could use to interrogate people.
"What's your sexuality?" "Straight." "So, not Super Straight?" "Uh. N-n-nope...just straight." "Good answer."
Next thing you know the left has the entire standard heterosexual gender chalked up as LGBT allies, and anyone else categorized as a problematic exception. Normal straight people become a minority - on paper at least. Not in reality, but it's easy narrative control for subversion I think. Guaranteed they'll even start referring to it as the SS and associate it with nazis.
Granted, this Super Straight meme probably won't go that far, but I could see this being used as a test run. Or maybe even if this meme does grow and catch on, enough people will associate themselves with it that nothing really changes.
Probably overthinking the whole thing. Or maybe I'm underthinking it in the wrong direction 🤔?
I think the primary difference here is that people who declare themselves super straight aren't mentally deranged like the rest of the alphabet mafia. They know that they're just doing it to poke a hole through the eyes of the gender plethora.
Normies aren't going to need to declare anything because they're followers anyway. By the time they even become aware of super straight the whole situation will probably have played out.
If it gets to the point where they're interrogating people (and I have little doubt it will, given the current course remains unchallenged) - then we're going to have much much bigger problems to deal with.
I wasn't really thinking of serious interrogations. Just using that word to refer to the lefty questioning they might do to force someone to take a stance. More commonly done to celebrities really - I don't know if they do it to ordinary people, although I have seen it on internet forums as well.
That aside, hopefully you're right and this all goes nowhere. My post is just intended to present the possible option that exists here. An option for the left to try to turn basic heterosexuality into a shamed minority (again - on paper, not in reality), identified by a lack of trans involvement. Thinking long term.