A thought occurred amidst this 'superstraight' silliness: It's clearly an ironic term, it's clear that it's just being done to poke fun. But what if we simply gave it a serious name and said with a straight face that we're something like 'cis-sexual' (the name is simply something that seemed reasonable to me) ? We could get some long-term traction if we treated this more seriously, it occurs to me. Just a thought :)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
No, because then you're normalizing insanity.
I dislike the word cis. It's called male, or female. Logic doesn't work with the trans fascists, super is great for using humor and their own arguments against them but with truth
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. It was trending so leave it alone and push the explanation memes.
How about this: You fuck trannies, you're gay. You don't, you're straight.
It’s just fine the way it is currently. Serious as it needs to be.
Cis-normative biological female. Born female, still female, wants to remain female.
I don't understand the outrage from the trannies. I really don't.
I wouldn't fuck most REAL women alive. It's not because I don't like women. It's because I don't like those INDIVIDUALS. It's the same thing. Love doesn't care about gender or sex. I've never met a dude I wanted to fuck. I've met women I've banged, but that doesn't mean I'm a bigot. I guess all the dudes and trannies I've run into just aren't the ones for me.
It's not a slight against them for their lifestyle. I'm just not into them.