16
Comments (9)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
creamkern 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something like that. Supposedly that's why it was able to come out that quick. The mRNA stuff has not been giving great animal results so they had some history to begin human trials. That's why Moderna led, they were the only one still interested in it while others said - no way. And why they said, we won't give this out unless you give us full immunity etc. They didn't know what could happen long-term. Again, the animal trials did not go well.

3
Proud_American 3 points ago +3 / -0

Part of the rapid formulation comes from the fact that they don’t have to grow actual viruses to get the genetic protein chains, adjuvants, to make the concoction.

The synthetic mRNA also doesn’t produce antigens that cover the entire make-up of the virus, rather a tiny spike. Those antigens, after being mirrored to the virus, can actually play havoc with your immune system and cross into cells within the body and even cross the BBB.

3
NotMyGovernor [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jesus Fuck they could introduce something in the future which changes our cells to have the protein and then our immune system attacks our own cells. Or it could already be designed to attack certain foods to keep us from digesting certain things. Or possibly even attack certain endorphins / hormones the body gives to function cognitively for physically 100% correctly.

2
KlunniClowns 2 points ago +2 / -0

It did not go well.

During the experiments, all the animals died within 6 months. Eventually, the body attacks itself like an autoimmune disorder.

1
Proud_American 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, and if the “emergency” wasn’t used to justify the use of the shot those efficacy and detriment tests would have prevented it from being “approved.”