The reason government employees are so disproportionately vile is that state authority attracts low-status, low-quality people who are now in the position to demand the respect and deference that they would never be able to earn otherwise.
Imo, there should be no salaries for our elected officials for this reason. We should be discouraging such parasites from running. Obviously, there is still the problem of insider trading, but it's obvious that paying legislators more so they "won't sell out" was very wrong.
In my experience, you're not wrong. My generally-positive tone on The Police is based on the very small percentage who are good decent people who want to help society. It's difficult to be positive about a group that is more often than not a bunch of narcissistic power-tripping bullies who tend to avoid the high-crime zones for easier more-lucrative prey among "wipipo" who are less likely to resist arrest/shoot at them (who have nicer cars/property to seize and the means to pay fines.)
I can't blame them really, they do deal with the worst elements of society: lots of drunk/drugged unreasonable people who are often so deep into the "blackout" state they won't remember the confrontation. I do appreciate their efforts, obviously I don't want to live in a country without Police because... look how bad things are already in the medium-to-big cities, and that's with Police trying to keep things under control.
The "defund the police" narrative can only work in an environment of the "honor system." In the Mayberry-like Flyover State small-town where I grew up, people still leave their doors unlocked with a shotgun displayed over the fireplace. I rarely see big watchdogs or security fences there, none of the usual signs of battening down the hatches one often sees when crime is a frequent issue. They could "defund the police" with little effect- because they have no crime to speak of. (Obviously there are other factors of absence at play, along with being a near-100% Christian blue-collar/family-oriented populace my old small-town also has none of the jogger/gangsta/loud sub-woofer/random gunfire/homeless issue that plagues bigger towns.)
tl;dr I Back The Blue in most cases, because they are essential to our peaceful society (but reserve the right to call out wrongdoings if/when they arise.) Checks and balances are necessary, because their power can be easily abused (although these days things tend to be slanted way too far in the favor of criminals which is obviously not a good thing.) To be clear, I am as a rule quite pro-Police/Law & Order and have several friends and family who are LEOs and SWAT.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. You get a lot of pathetic people who only want power and they’re generally shitty people in the real world. No decent person I know actually enjoys controlling other people.
It... it is their program. DHS runs on policies set by the office. As the executive branch, everything down is your program. What a dumb bitch. And a room full of sopping wet pussies for not calling her on her shit.
That's a pretty good sign that these clowns are even worse than expected.
It's one thing to make up bad things about the Bad Orange Man, but to have to make up good things about Dementia Joe is perhaps too herculean of a task for a simple MSM hack.
Cunt
To an extent this is how I feel about police officers
Positions of authority will always attract those that want to abuse it, politicians and cops are probably the worst ones.
Imo, there should be no salaries for our elected officials for this reason. We should be discouraging such parasites from running. Obviously, there is still the problem of insider trading, but it's obvious that paying legislators more so they "won't sell out" was very wrong.
In my experience, you're not wrong. My generally-positive tone on The Police is based on the very small percentage who are good decent people who want to help society. It's difficult to be positive about a group that is more often than not a bunch of narcissistic power-tripping bullies who tend to avoid the high-crime zones for easier more-lucrative prey among "wipipo" who are less likely to resist arrest/shoot at them (who have nicer cars/property to seize and the means to pay fines.)
I can't blame them really, they do deal with the worst elements of society: lots of drunk/drugged unreasonable people who are often so deep into the "blackout" state they won't remember the confrontation. I do appreciate their efforts, obviously I don't want to live in a country without Police because... look how bad things are already in the medium-to-big cities, and that's with Police trying to keep things under control.
The "defund the police" narrative can only work in an environment of the "honor system." In the Mayberry-like Flyover State small-town where I grew up, people still leave their doors unlocked with a shotgun displayed over the fireplace. I rarely see big watchdogs or security fences there, none of the usual signs of battening down the hatches one often sees when crime is a frequent issue. They could "defund the police" with little effect- because they have no crime to speak of. (Obviously there are other factors of absence at play, along with being a near-100% Christian blue-collar/family-oriented populace my old small-town also has none of the jogger/gangsta/loud sub-woofer/random gunfire/homeless issue that plagues bigger towns.)
tl;dr I Back The Blue in most cases, because they are essential to our peaceful society (but reserve the right to call out wrongdoings if/when they arise.) Checks and balances are necessary, because their power can be easily abused (although these days things tend to be slanted way too far in the favor of criminals which is obviously not a good thing.) To be clear, I am as a rule quite pro-Police/Law & Order and have several friends and family who are LEOs and SWAT.
Also, being respectful to anyone never hurts and also helps to change well intentioned individuals that are having a rough day.
It also helps to spot the nasty ones because of how normal people respond to be treated respectfully.
describes every jogger affirmative action hire working in city government
Couldn’t have said it better myself. You get a lot of pathetic people who only want power and they’re generally shitty people in the real world. No decent person I know actually enjoys controlling other people.
Micheal Malice, what a throat ripping beast
This goes for dorks in the tech industry as well. Someone like Zuckerberg would never touch a female, let alone marry one, if he didn't have IT.
It... it is their program. DHS runs on policies set by the office. As the executive branch, everything down is your program. What a dumb bitch. And a room full of sopping wet pussies for not calling her on her shit.
Great, it's their program. So let's continue the border wall construction and enforcing proper immigration law.
Frankly, I'm surprised she's getting any adverse questions.
That's a pretty good sign that these clowns are even worse than expected.
It's one thing to make up bad things about the Bad Orange Man, but to have to make up good things about Dementia Joe is perhaps too herculean of a task for a simple MSM hack.
They are way better at destroying productive societies than anything else.
She’s been the biggest one we’ve seen in a while.
Maybe the latest biggest cunt. But Pelosi is the mother of all giant cunts.
When she passes the stench will blanket the Earth and you'll be able to hear demons excited about their new toy.
Hillary Clinton says "hold my beer".
"Hold my vial of children's blood" more like
AOC says "hold my rape whistle".
You mean grandmother of all giant cunts.
Man, she is old AF.
She's not old.
She's ancient.
That's true, but more like great grandmother, she's older than dirt
Here a C there a C everywhere a C C, ##CUNT
My thought exactly.