2901
Floyd Trial Drama (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Doochebag ago by Doochebag +2902 / -1
Comments (258)
sorted by:
293
Chaospyke 293 points ago +293 / -0

There's no way Chauvin gets a fair trial. Even if by some illogical chance he gets off, BLM will probably murder him in the street and be celebrated. The only Jurors are going to be those that buy the lie or are acquiesce to the mob.

215
deleteDems 215 points ago +215 / -0

The justice system has clearly collapsed in the face of intimidation from radicals.

125
Fuck_The_NWO 125 points ago +125 / -0

True power is being able to apply the rule of law when and where you see fit or to suspend it whenever you want. We're seeing who actually has power in this country.

48
DonJr2032 48 points ago +49 / -1

I thought the jurors are able to remain anonymous?

127
IT_WAS_THE_RUSSIANS 127 points ago +127 / -0

CNN doxxed a kid for smiling at a guy and damn near ruined his life. You think anyone can remain anonymous if the powers that be want them to suffer?

30
Friar_Pede 30 points ago +32 / -2

Story had a happy ending though

22
gamexa 22 points ago +22 / -0

HanSoloAsshole for a less happy outcome.

-5
NerBolanski -5 points ago +26 / -31

Nick sandman has turned out to be a big faggot.

13
KeysToNeW 13 points ago +15 / -2

How so? Isn't he probably, what, 18 years old?

25
NerBolanski 25 points ago +27 / -2

He shits regularly on Lin Wood,follows neocons and advocates for Mitch McConnell.he was also disputing and doubting our election fraud claims.

2
Coolidge 2 points ago +8 / -6

He's mad because Sandman dissed Lin Wood.

3
Greg867 3 points ago +5 / -2

Explain

14
NerBolanski 14 points ago +14 / -0

He supports McConnell.he shits regularly on Lin wood and he made some absurd statements when we were trying to get the courts to accept our cases.

-5
Redditcensorsyouandi -5 points ago +1 / -6

I bet he wont, and if he does, it will be some dumb shit.

-4
AUGUSTO_PINOCHET -4 points ago +2 / -6

You sound like a big faggot.

7
NerBolanski 7 points ago +10 / -3

Imagine lapping as Pinochet and being a faggot like you.Nick Sandman supports McConnell, shits on his Lin wood and made absurd statements about MAGA and Trump when we were trying to get the courts to accept our case.

34
marishiten 34 points ago +34 / -0

They still have to come and go from the court house every day.

They're not being given protection. So it wouldn't take much for someone to camp out, get pictures of everyone that shows up monday-friday and narrow them down.

There's a fucking huge protest at the courthouse right now.

10
DonJr2032 10 points ago +11 / -1

There have been many controversial court cases prior to today, with crowds and angry people. How were all those hundreds of other cases handled?

20
CantStumpTheTrump 20 points ago +21 / -1

THe same way; they just weren't worried that the groups they elevated to not being able to do no wrong might do something wrong.

7
goldkeyboardwarrior 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is probably by far the most controversial criminal trial in the internet age. The Rodney King and OJ Simpson trials don't have shit on this, and both of them were in the 90s when the internet just barely went commercial. Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman may have been what started BLM, but it wasn't as bad as Floyd (the conspiracy theorist in me thinks they didn't use Martin's death like Floyd's because Obama was still president at the time and they didn't have a Republican draining the swamp to get rid of).

Floyd's death resulted in billions of dollars of damage, caused a presidential candidate to kneel for him, and may possibly be the biggest reason Kamala Harris was chosen to be Biden's running mate instead of someone like Gretchen Whitmer or Sally Yates. Trust me, the jurors on this trial are probably terrified to find Chauvin not guilty no matter what the evidence says. If they do find him not guilty, I'm inclined to think they would have to put the jurors in witness protection while riots probably cause another billion dollars of damage to the country.

5
Pegstar69 5 points ago +5 / -0

Michael Robinson, Ferguson started burn loot murder

3
spez__ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Rodney King was another George Floyd thing, fyi. Media lied back then, too.

1
TP4bunghole 1 point ago +1 / -0

In those cases media and big tech hadn't yet advocated for a free pass for mass violence against non-leftists.

Attacking a juror used to mean risking prison - now the media/tech will make you into a hero, and the corrupt justice system won't prosecute.

4
Blue_Country_Refugee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Surely they are going to be sequestered.

16
MindsetRoulette 16 points ago +16 / -0

Not so much any more. The Left poked holes in anonymous parts of the Justice system with the argument "they have a Right to face their accuser" that quickly turned into witnesses getting killed before trials.

21
AbsoluteChad 21 points ago +21 / -0

I get your point, but: The right to face an accuser is guaranteed in the Constitution and without it, fair trials would be impossible.

The problem here isn’t whether jurors can remain anonymous. The problem here is that we’ve allowed riots and assaults to take place as long as the cause is “good” and the victims are “bad.” This is a law enforcement failure.

5
MindsetRoulette 5 points ago +6 / -1

Sure, but that right to face their accuser was still respected because witnesses would be present at trial but kept secret until trial so they couldn't be murdered/intimidated before the trial.

The Communist Left has been intentionally weakening those protections to prevent intimidation/murder. They Fortified the Justice process like they Fortified the election process.

11
Newspeak 11 points ago +11 / -0

The right to face your accuser protects you from the state and is not a leftist idea. It's to stop you from getting railroaded by the state on made up charges. There's a reason it's NUMBER SIX behind the fourth and fifth amendments.

4th - no unreasonable search and seizure

5th - right to fair trial

6th - right to face your accuser

If I decide to drive my car down the side walk and run people over is my fault or the manufacturer for leaving me the option? Was it the commies that poked holes in pedestrian safety by allowing power steering to be sold with my car? Listen to yourself.

Stop making excuses for terrorists. You're witnessing the result of an infection that started in the 60's and was left untreated. Fucking do something about it.

3
AbsoluteChad 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it depends on the state. I know for a fact some states are required to give a criminal defendant a list of witnesses they intent to call and it’s been that way for a long time.

In my thinking, the real problem here isn’t whether protections have been weakened. It’s that law enforcement has been weakened when it comes to stopping leftist mobs from intimidation.

10
Brellin 10 points ago +10 / -0

The juror isn't the accuser though. That argument literally doesn't work.

3
MindsetRoulette 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was just saying there are hole being created to make it easier and easier to identify people so the mob can find and intimidate them.

3
MegoThor 3 points ago +3 / -0

A jury isn’t the accuser.

1
TP4bunghole 1 point ago +1 / -0

The right to face an accuser is a fundamental part of the Constitution. That isn't the problem - the problem is corrupt prosecutors encouraging violence by not prosecuting people they support politically.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Jurors are not the accusers though, right?

1
MindsetRoulette 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point being, weakening protections against mob rule so their mob can rule. Color Revolutions are no joke and China had perfected the art. Families are tearing themselves apart over politics.... That should terrify us all.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yeah, no shit. Just saying that the juror isn't the accuser. So the right to face the accusser isn't exactly applying to them.

that said, without a lawenforcement that enforces the law equally, we get this mob rule problem.

3
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not a chance.

3
Devildtails 3 points ago +3 / -0

Silicone Valley’s facial recognition enters the chat...

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is the definition of tyranny.

19
Kaarous 19 points ago +19 / -0

No system that permits leftists to be a part of it, ever remains functioning.

Always gatekeep.

4
tootoo22 4 points ago +4 / -0

We've now devolved into mob rule.

3
NavySTG 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why we'll lose.

2
GlobalUnity 2 points ago +2 / -0

And they WILL come after you and your children next because we did nothing. I guarantee it.

34
marishiten 34 points ago +35 / -1

He's not going to get off.

He's going to get hit with Excessive Force no matter what happens.

Did he commit murder? No, I don't think so. You MIGHT be able to argue manslaughter. MAYBE. But that's a stretch. But he's not going to get hit with Murder and if the state keeps pushing Murder and isn't willing to drop the charge down, he's going to be acquitted.

30
Loiuzein 30 points ago +30 / -0

He used exactly the force he was trained to use, as documented repeatedly.

11
whippeat 11 points ago +13 / -2

It probably doesn’t matter for a jury trial. Facts don’t matter.

They’ll be played the video of the kneeling again and again. The audio of ‘I can’t breathe’ again and again. Made to live out that 8 minutes again and again.

And they’ll ask ‘the first time he said he couldn’t breathe, why didn’t you move?’ Second time. Third time. Fourth time. Etc etc.

They’ll play on emotions, and that’s how the prosecution will make their case. Easiest case in the world to prosecute when you have a video and everybody hates the guy who did it.

12
thedaynos 12 points ago +12 / -0

And they’ll ask ‘the first time he said he couldn’t breathe, why didn’t you move?’ Second time. Third time. Fourth time. Etc etc.

See, easy answer here. The defendants will show the full video. They'll show the part where they had him in the back seat of the car saying that he couldn't breathe 2,3,4 times. They'll show that they took him out of the car and called an ambulance and LET HIM get on the ground AS HE REQUESTED.

The jurors will see the full video and all of the evidence, not just small clips that the fake news want everyone to see.

0
bighomiebeenchillin 0 points ago +1 / -1

homie you do realize da defense will play their own vids too right? they’ll play da same exact vids as da prosecutors but ALL of da context before and after that went down.

and they got da toxic doctor reports of da shit ton of drugs up in his system. and da coroner report saying he didnt die from choking or any physical injury.

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like evidence needs to be shown in the court these days.

1
bighomiebeenchillin 1 point ago +2 / -1

it do

1
R-A-T-S- 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not according to the other courts out there who are like "The point is Moot" or "You have no standing" and don't even review anything

1
whippeat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but you’re thinking like a rational person. I worry the jury will not be

15
Hades440 15 points ago +15 / -0

Wasn't the official cause of death a drug overdose? "Your honor, exhibit A." "Ok then, case dismissed."

5
GlobalUnity 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, when I first heard "murder" I was sure of one of two things… either they are utterly incompetent prosecutors … or they are intentionally pursuing murder to get the not guilty judgement.

3
Colonel_Dax 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is a legal hole that does not permit the accused to be charged with a lesser crime if he is found innocent of Murder 1. DAs use it all the time with cops, so they can shrug and say, "It's the system..." when they want the popo to walk, and it still lets the prosecutor burnish their record when the DA wants to run for guv. Floyd offed himself when he swallowed his stash, to hide it.

1
rn10950 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't he charged with murder 2 though?

1
ActualAdult 1 point ago +1 / -0

They haven't brought a charge of 'excessive force'.

Does 2nd degree murder include "didn't take the precise series of actions that would have saved his life because trying to do so would have put colleagues at risk from a large struggling drugged up criminal"?

26
beev_bove_biv 26 points ago +27 / -1

You misunderstand. The prosecutor KNEW the charges can't possibly stick. Given the available evidence, Chauvin is definitely going to walk.

BLM will then lose their shit. THAT was the plan from the beginning.

15
JaneMN 15 points ago +15 / -0

There will be riots no matter what the jury decides. Defense just revealed the poor job BCA did during the investigation.

"They are in fact methamphetamine and fentanyl, and they contain the DNA of George Floyd," Nelson said.

https://www.kare11.com/article/news/crime/chauvins-attorney-says-he-other-lawyers-found-george-floyds-drugs-in-back-of-police-car/89-651e55f4-b829-445b-9dfd-189b867cc489

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like how if soccer team loses or wins, the fans still riot in the street and burn shit down.

2
KuhlooKuhlay 2 points ago +3 / -1

He's got a lot of other charges unrelated to this as well: tax evasion and possibly bribery and fraud.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
12
PepeTheFrug 12 points ago +12 / -0

in my 2 times of serving on juries for not national headlines, we were never told details of the case prior to being in the trial. we were asked certain questions beforehand to probe if we may be biased. however, with questions like this, it should be pretty obvious what case theyre selecting jurors for and it will surely be apparent when the trial starts. youd be hard pressed to find somebody who hasnt heard about george kirby. all it takes is one pede to say, "nah, hes not guilty" and we can get the riots going already.

4
when_we_win_remember 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's gonna be hard in this case. They'll probably make an exception.

Really they should move the trial. IDK where. Antarctica

99
Doochebag [S] 99 points ago +100 / -1

They’ve now struck Juror #8 from the jury

https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1369372466079031297?s=28

76
bidensmissingbrain 76 points ago +76 / -0

He was preemptively struck by the prosecution because he stated he would try to be fair and look at the facts...

55
Oskar 55 points ago +55 / -0

He isn't wrong though. The jury is going to get doxxed for sure

26
HeavyVetting 26 points ago +26 / -0

Uno reverse he gets doxed anyway for not eagerly trying to get on the jury and acquit.

16
RememberKosciuszko 16 points ago +16 / -0

If the knee doesn't fit you must acquit

3
zipodk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The lessor of the doxing

Might not remember rodney king but if this ain't guilty verdict that will look like child's play

6
z89101 6 points ago +6 / -0

DNC Coveted Criminal base gonna riot regardless and the jurors either convict or they get smoked 1st up.

2
Wrexxis780 2 points ago +2 / -0

He probably made this statement to get out of it.

86
Chopblock 86 points ago +87 / -1

Members of the Supreme Court can serve on juries?

19
bluto36 19 points ago +20 / -1

spicy

61
MichelleOsAdamsApple 61 points ago +65 / -4

It's just a other kangaroo court. The cop is white, there is no such thing as a fair trial for whites in the courty.

-39
Ez_mac -39 points ago +5 / -44

What a load of bullshit. Are you aware of the Rodney King beating? Those cops got off scot free. There are numerous instances where white accused are exonerated. Please list to me the white people you feel who were wrongly convicted in the recent past. stupid comments like yours only encourage far-left lunatics to label us all racist neanderthals. The most prejudiced Americans who “have standing” into how unfairly they’ve been treated in court in the recent past are Black Americans. So stfu you retard.

27
JuanTitor 27 points ago +27 / -0

-- Recent past -- Rodney King

Pick one

15
HrshySqrt77 15 points ago +15 / -0

🤣. I mean. C'mon man. That was ONLY like 30 years ago. And then some people did something. You know...the thing.

19
gamexa 19 points ago +19 / -0

Dude, Rodney King was thirty years ago. We went gay marriage to tranny kids in five years, you think maybe some shit has changed on the racial front in thirty years? Who's your next example, Emmett Till?

4
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Steve Avery and Brendan Dassey were 100% wrongfully convicted.

Look up the Innocence Project. They have tons of white guys who were wrongfully convincted and had their sentences overturned. Tons of them who are still pending or who have had their appeals run out (proof that whitey doesn't always win).

They also represent people of every racial background and have had success overturning numerous cases. It's a shame that these ever happen, but to pretend that it doesn't happen to white people or that the numbers are skewed overwhelmingly against black people simply because they're black has no basis.

3
ReligionOfPoop 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was arrested for spanking my son after my fiance called the police on me and then she moved a new man into the home 3 weeks later.

I was facing near felony charges for spanking him. On his rear. Something she asked me to do on her behalf as well.

I am white.

First degree misdemeanors...for spanking my son on his rear.

Save me the "blacks have it so hard" sentiment.

1
MichelleOsAdamsApple 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please, blacks in America are the most privileged people on planet earth. They are offered an unlimited supply of handouts at the expense of everyone else. They can rob, loot and murder with impunity and just use 'muh raysis' as an excuse. They can kidnap and torture white kids and face absolutely 0 punishment. You can be a fucking druggy, OD on fentanyl and the entire black community will parade around like you were a fucking Saint. Your not allowed to defend yourself against a group of degenerate joggers or the liberal trash and leftist owned courts will make an example out of you.

I could give 2 fucks what the left label me as. The entire black community is a net negative and the last few years have shown that to be clear as day. Are there some that are decent citizens? Sure, but they are outliers. It's weak fucks like you that pretend to be some preacher of wisdom that have contributed to the continued degeneracy of the black community. You can't ever hold them accountable, you just make excuse after excuse. It's fucking pathetic. If only gun laws were there to favor the law abiding citizenry, then maybe that pregnant woman Fentanyl Floyd robbed could have put a hollow point in his noodle and helped clean up her community. Instead we get a golden casket and months of chimpouts because some piece of shit died while black. Boo fucking hoo.

50
Kckroosian 50 points ago +50 / -0

Any juror is taking their life in their hands if they vote to acquit. I expect jurors to be known before the trial is over.

27
PoohClimbsTrees 27 points ago +27 / -0

They will for sure be known if he is acquitted. Lefty's will leak thst list immediately.

3
sordfysh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not even. Anyone who is there will be deemed responsible if even one votes to acquit. After all, they don't release the voting record of the jury.

47
bit0101 47 points ago +51 / -4

How do people still not know how to get out of jury duty? Just say you've already decided the guilt or innocence of the person and nothing in the trial will change that.

62
Gwoz8881 62 points ago +63 / -1

I wanted to do it once. Got selected for a grand jury. Then the dumb bitch DA “accidentally” leaked every jurors identity and I called that cunt out. Showed up at the courthouse 15 min before 8am. Then a receive an email at 7:59am saying I’ve been dismissed. Fuck her

43
gregariousbarbarian 43 points ago +43 / -0

Should be disbarred.

32
Gwoz8881 32 points ago +35 / -3

I went off on her for a few days and she knew she fucked up. My ex gf said she felt bad for the DA with how hard I called her out on her bullshit. I’m sure she was worried I would do an official complaint against her. So I feel like I did good :)

36
Brellin 36 points ago +36 / -0

I mean you should have done an official complaint. Use the weapons of the enemy, get them fired for their bullshit the same way they would get you fired for literally everything you may have said or done regardless of how long ago you said or did it. At the very least your own complaint would have been a lot more legitimate.

20
Gwoz8881 20 points ago +20 / -0

This was nearly 10 years ago. If it happened today, I would definitely do that. I was a different person back then

4
KeysToNeW 4 points ago +4 / -0

She'd get a pat on the back.

16
farstriderr 16 points ago +16 / -0

I intentionally revealed my name after serving on a murder trial to tell my story and the story of the jurors. I don't give a fuck. Bernie voter voted not guilty because the murderer was a woman. These liberal fuckfaces and their ideology need to be stood up to or they will never go away.

Scared? Not really. Rage-filled was more like it. Anyone who tries to fuck with me dies. Being scared to stand up for what you believe in is the same thing as wearing the masks because you're afraid of a flu virus.

19
PepeTheFrug 19 points ago +19 / -0

at my last job i got picked for jury duty. they have jury duty leave and its paid on top of the $40/day or whatever the government pays the jury. sat on trial for a week. easy money. plus, i enjoy being an active member and having some small role in society.

4
Blue_Country_Refugee 4 points ago +6 / -2

As a professional, I would still be responsible for all my normal duties. I'm salary, not hourly. So all you are offering me on that jury is 8 hours of work for $40.

7
NoNewFrens 7 points ago +8 / -1

Easy if you get a jury duty card just throw it away and never call the number. I've done it 3 times now never got in trouble. The mail loses letters all the time and they aren't certified

3
Blue_Country_Refugee 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yup that's what I do.

17
unashamed 17 points ago +18 / -1

Jury Nullification

4
unashamed 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s the quickest way to get released and possibly poison the pool that you’re sitting with. Courts have tried to suppress individuals who handout jury nullification pamphlets with “juror tampering” charges. So use at your own risk.

That said, I know people hate jury duty. But who else is going to help decide these cases if based patriots don’t participate? Your average low-information voter who can’t think critically? That should be what scares you the most.

8
AlcoholicRetard 8 points ago +10 / -2

I always just say I hate the police.

31
IT_WAS_THE_RUSSIANS 31 points ago +31 / -0

That might get you put ON the jury nowadays, depending on case and location.

11
80960KA 11 points ago +11 / -0

But I hate ghetto shitbags more!

3
Nameless_Mofo 3 points ago +3 / -0

well played, fren

1
unashamed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Last jury selection I was at, a Tilda Swinton lookalike said she had family in the CIA. They kept her on.

6
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +6 / -0

I’m sure the Minneapolis prosecutors would welcome you to the jury, fren!

5
williammcfadden 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then they will move you to a very long civil trial. Seen that happen.

33
MarginofFraud 33 points ago +33 / -0

Translation: the jury knows the prosecution have no case, but they know some anonymous woke staffer will leak their names to the press and get them lynched if they don't declare Chauvin guilty.

30
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 30 points ago +30 / -0

what's the big deal? someone attacks your home you can call the police.

23
williammcfadden 23 points ago +23 / -0

You mean call the local citizen ambassador with a clipboard?

11
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 11 points ago +11 / -0

dEfUnD CiTiZeN aMbAssAdorS!

9
Nameless_Mofo 9 points ago +9 / -0

someone attacks your home you can call the police a social worker.

FTFY

4
bluebahloo 4 points ago +4 / -0

And report to the dispatcher that you've nullified the threat with a machine gun.

4
HrshySqrt77 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck it. Call Kyle Rittenhouse. He's only like one or two states over. At least we all know he'll do something.

3
GlobalUnity 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldn't call the police. I'd be too worried they'd arrive blasting anything they see. Better call them when the bodies are cooled down and you've finished up what you were doing and can get an attorney over.

18
KuhlooKuhlay 18 points ago +19 / -1

Watch the film "Mugabe and the White African" if you guys want some tips about how this will all go down in the courtroom, during the trial and the aftermath.

23
DoIMAGAYouHornyBaby 23 points ago +23 / -0

Jump to the 7:45 mark, it all makes sense. “A white person cannot be a Zimbabwean anymore, we dont care we want you gone.” And other tribal garbage.

6
KuhlooKuhlay 6 points ago +7 / -1

It's a great movie if you haven't seen it. Really shows the ridiculousness of their court system. It was by BBC Wales I think of all places, I dunno I saw it a few years ago with a friend and it was a real eye opener for her.

1
when_we_win_remember 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was it a monkey trial?

2
KuhlooKuhlay 2 points ago +3 / -1

it wasn't a total shit show. they at least had advocates that appeared to fight hard for them, but the bottom line is the system is so stacked against them and they have like beyond second class citizenship in their own country despite having wealth, being well liked and respected in their community, etc. Their lawyers actually bawl their eyes out several times in the doc. and show great love for their white clients.

That's the real shocking part about it is that 90% or more of the BLACKS are against it too. They know what's up and realize these farmers all provide stable, safe and overall good employment. It's actually foreign (mostly Chinese) influencers who gamed the legal system and are using it and of course physical violence to basically take over the country. They enrich themselves and of course a handful of roving local mafiosos.

If you've ever seen an even handed historical account of apartheid it's basically the same thing that happened then.

1
America1stAndOnly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it was in Africa, so...

9
NerBolanski 9 points ago +10 / -1

Europeans and white Americans need to realize that liberalism is cancer.We have too low in-group preference and it is destroying us.Conservatives also have white guilt.

13
JBlaze056 13 points ago +14 / -1

Smart juror

12
DaayTerkErJerbs 12 points ago +12 / -0

Terrorism is now standard operating procedure for the left.

8
SinisterEaglePatriot 8 points ago +8 / -0

Always has been.

1
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their heroes are the Jacobins from the French Revolution, not American musketmen.

11
StepItUp 11 points ago +11 / -0

Everyone willing to hear the evidence won't sit on the jury. Only people who will convict him. It's biased from the start. No way you can get a trial in highly politicized cases. Our system of justice is trash.

9
deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
11
Redditcensorsyouandi 11 points ago +11 / -0

He should get a raise for dealing with this bullshit, je should sue every outlet that called him a murderer including Kieth Ellison who withheld the full body cam footage for 3 months of fires, and should win them all easily.

Instead if he is aquitted, he will be found and chimped to death in the streets or he will be found guilty and tossed in jail where he will be found and chimped to death in his cell.

Justice is dead.

7
whippeat 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah. He should be a multi, multi millionaire by the time this is all over

3
Redditcensorsyouandi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Promoted to Detective at least too, or whatever department he likes ffs

5
Pickinpox 5 points ago +5 / -0

And the state definitely wants him on the jury.

Tow the line or else bigoted waycisss

5
MAGA_____bitches 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can anybody tell me why they just didn't handcuff that drug addict and throw him in the back of a cop car?

18
ohwens 18 points ago +18 / -0

They did, watch the video. He was in the car...didn't want to be in the car...tried to get out of the car...then (i think) asked to get out of the car and lay down.

7
Redditcensorsyouandi 7 points ago +7 / -0

They should have just driven him off to the station after tossing his big ass in the back like a slab of bison. They gave him many courtesies and it will cost them everything.

6
zippy2 6 points ago +7 / -1

You didn't watch the video. While they were trying to keep him in the car he flopped out like a fish

7
Redditcensorsyouandi 7 points ago +8 / -1

I did watch it.

They should have slammed the door immediately, if possible.

Its been awhile since I watched it but I seem to remember them just sitting there talking with him while he was in the back and when he said he wanted to lay on the ground and they just happily obliged his odd request.

Thats what happens. No good deed goes unpunished.

4
zippy2 4 points ago +6 / -2

Sitting there talking with him and happily obliged his request?

3
Redditcensorsyouandi 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yea after they initially put him in the back, they just hung out back there for a while with him trying to talk sense into him, basically convince him that he is breathing. They offered to roll down the window so he could get some air but he insisted that he go lay down on the ground. So they obliged him.

3
EricCiaramellaSuxDix 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damned if you do, damned if you don't

1
zippy2 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are mental

10
PraiseBeToScience 10 points ago +10 / -0

They literally were concerned for his health. They called an ambulance at the same time they got him out of his car, because they recognized he was completely out of his mind on drugs.

9
WhiteTrashJesus 9 points ago +9 / -0

He was literally too high and large for them to do that

7
Mattrocksalot 7 points ago +7 / -0

It took 3 full grown men to get him to stay down

6
PraiseBeToScience 6 points ago +7 / -1

Some people think they can overpower me.

Maybe.

*sniff*

Maybe.

I've yet to see someone overpower boolit.

7
Grond999 7 points ago +7 / -0

He said "I can't breathe" in the back of the police vehicle.

3
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cause he was on meth and fent. The news is so fucking distorted you'd never know either of those things.

4
Former_Libtard 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, fucking duh!

4
Flptplt 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should be concerned about that. In a rational world he and his friends and family would defend themselves with firearms. However we know that they would immediately be prosecuted if they defended themselves against leftists.

Diversity doesn't work. everything happening in America is because of diversity.

4
vongregormench 4 points ago +5 / -1

Jurror #8 is smart and therefore will probably not be picked.

4
DudeNoOne 4 points ago +4 / -0

How is there not a change of venue for this. Literally anywhere else in the state they could have held this trial.

4
deleted 4 points ago +10 / -6
4
corona79 4 points ago +4 / -0

In other news, water is wet,

3
tholins 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is a VERY real concern.

3
TheCandorist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because unless there is a conviction the dude will get murdered by a jogger thanks to the media. Probably lose his job first.

3
Ocrazio-Cortez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have the jurors wear costumes. Like The Wizard of Oz or The Purge.

3
Slothboy 3 points ago +3 / -0

How have they not moved this trial to some other city?

Seems like there is a very good case for a change of venue

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mistrial. Release and acquit the accused.

3
Redditcensorsyouandi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hes right, they will chimp out no matter the outcome, but will most likely burn his house down in a mostly peaceful arson if he walks.

Their "celebrations" look awfully similar to their mostly peaceful "protests".

3
farstriderr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy shit. I'd stay on, then after the trial i'd dox myself. Open season on commies, riggers, and antifags.

These people will never go away until people with balls choose to stand up to them.

3
xBigCoffinHunter 3 points ago +3 / -0

He should be concerned, but no worries. A Minneapolis Social Worker will make a detailed report of his family’s murder.

3
keeptherepublic100 3 points ago +3 / -0

and this is why the courts rule in favor of the left. We do not act that way for better or for worse. maybe this will be the trigger that gets the left to make the first "real" move because until they do that we will stand back, as we should

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Dialectic 3 points ago +4 / -1

The ghetto is going to get wiped out and hung from light poles when (IF) the middle class decides to go clean house, given how useless government is currently. I mean, other than stealing our wealth and putting boots on our necks. They're pretty good at that.

Oh and being faggots and trannies. FBI excels at that.

2
Ifeargovtmorethan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Smart way to not get picked.......

2
hunterforprison 2 points ago +2 / -0

The rapture is near

1
BotFlyPenis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope so. Take me out of this evil clown world.

2
DeplorableSpic3 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he would be right

2
Curlybill 2 points ago +2 / -0

In a sane world BLM would be held accountable as an organized crime syndicate, and jury tampering would be in the list of charges.

2
CynicalTwit22 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't blame ANY juror for this apprehension

2
Marielle_Redclaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just say Chauvin died of a stroke, and put his family in witness protection with new identities.

Do I have to think of everything?

1
BotFlyPenis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fairest thing that could happen. Police won't/can't protect the jurors or their families from the mob.

2
Mattrocksalot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Id pay security to escort me

1
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the rest of your life?

2
newuser999 2 points ago +2 / -0

The juror is absolutely correct. In fact he may not be able to hold a job after the aquittal

2
ALEXFUCKINGJONES 2 points ago +2 / -0

we're already at a mistrial. GG

2
AGuyFromAus 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is literally no way that trial can be held fairly in that state.

It's already been amply demonstrated that the rule of law no longer applies in any regard when the BLM fascists decide to riot.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
cryptoa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should just say no standing and moot and let the man go.

If anything Democrats should be giving him a golden throne and millions of dollars. Him along with COVID were key in their propaganda war against Trump. Without Chauvin they might not have been able to accomplish the steal.

How long till Dems rewrite history and cast Chauvin as the hero of the Dem party and liberator of the US from the Tyranny of Donald J Drumpf?

2
dontdrinksoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the pussies shouted: GUILTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

1
Brethern123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or we might send you pizza and a lobstergram...he might be o to something there. Juror 8 I like you

1
thallos 1 point ago +1 / -0

He sounds like a guy who will be voting not guilty.

1
independentbystander 1 point ago +1 / -0

The really crazy part: they will riot either way, and the jurors will be threatened either way. Maybe this is the "aware of this on both levels" Kumala referred to when encouraging continued rioting (on Colbert's CBS show before the election.)

We are in a dire situation that I never expected to see: how did we get from "we don't negotiate with terrorists" to the Supreme Court being intimidated into refusing to hear election-fraud cases- supposedly over issues of rioting? This has been going on since the Rodney King/OJ Simpson cases with worse and worse results by the year, juries and courts and police being intimidated out of doing the right thing by the threat of rioting.

Several years ago, a friend of mine told me after serving jury duty/delivering the verdict, they had the jurors exit the hallway where the convict's family was bemoaning the conviction of their good boy (who dindunuffin and was on his way to church to study for his GED) having fatally shot someone in public in broad daylight in a bustling hood. I assumed the courthouse would separate/protect the jurors from the spectators/angry horde of joggers ready to burn stuff, apparently not so much.

1
doodaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like they have to force a mistrial. Between the mayor/police and the citizens, they have made it impossible to get a fair trial, and they have done this by poisoning the case with violence and lies on a national scale, in advance of the trial.