It was part of the plan. They might have a hard time showing the ballots came from China AND they were used in 2020.
But this written communication time-stamped with the destruction of evidence gives them an arguably better stance with spoliation.
Especially because the shredding could have been an accident. The fire could have been an accident. But the combo is not. And they can admit the written text as evidence, even if it's hearsay because the opponent caused the evidence to be destroyed.
He really needs to learn to keep his mouth shut if he has the goods on anything.
It was part of the plan. They might have a hard time showing the ballots came from China AND they were used in 2020.
But this written communication time-stamped with the destruction of evidence gives them an arguably better stance with spoliation.
Especially because the shredding could have been an accident. The fire could have been an accident. But the combo is not. And they can admit the written text as evidence, even if it's hearsay because the opponent caused the evidence to be destroyed.
The coverup is ALWAYS worse than the crime.