3872
Comments (692)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
210
deleted 210 points ago +210 / -0
49
deleted 49 points ago +49 / -0
58
deleted 58 points ago +58 / -0
16
Donger-Lord2 16 points ago +16 / -0

More bombers. MOAR!

9
Dereliction 9 points ago +10 / -1

Let's find out if they'll ban /r/supergay next.

7
Fabius 7 points ago +7 / -0

Why the fuck do you think it's "taken out"?

God, you guys are total fucking pussies. Super is a real movement and WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED.

-2
MapleBaconWaffles -2 points ago +2 / -4

My only issue with the Super Straight movement is that it doesn't do enough. We also need to address the reality that some straight people are attracted to opposite sex but same gender identifying individuals (men attracted to "transmen"). It's weird, but it's still a subset of straight.

Now, of course, this isn't to say the super straight movement is wrong. Lots of people are legitimately super straight. It's simply that we also need new terms that address the additional reality of individuals (potentially) attracted to any member of the opposite sex, regardless of gender identity.

Perhaps "Bio Straight", but I don't really care for it from a marketing perspective.

1
Amaroq64 1 point ago +1 / -0

Superstraight is just being straight. They just made a new name for it to get around transgender activists saying you can't be straight unless you take the girlcock.

Okay then, I'm not straight, I'm superstraight, it means a straight person who isn't attracted to transgenders.

In reality, sexual orientation is about sex, not gender. So a straight man being attracted to cis women and pre-transition transmen is just being a normal straight man.

4
NotFBI1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Superstraight.win?

10
Ponzo 10 points ago +10 / -0

You knew they were over the target the moment the media claimed they are nazis and white supremacists