Exactly, if the police just gave up chase when people tried to flee due to potential public safety risks. Then you would see a lot more people trying to evade the police because you've effectively normalized the behavior. Example, changing lanes or turning without a blinker is illegal but it's rare that you get pulled over for it so you see lots of people doing it without a second thought. (For the record, I try to always use my blinker because I hate it when other people don't.)
Apparently.... You guys are both literally ok with giving LETHAL AUTHORITY to government employees that can... In the heat-of-the-moment... Decide whether or not a person will or will not commit a crime against another human.
Sickening.
It's no different than monitory report. "Pre Crime"
It's immoral. Completely immoral. Not only that... It's unconstitutional.
Motherfuckers... You CANNOT see the future. Neither can the murderous cop that decided to act upon his apparent clarivoyance.
Our culture is dying. Our rights are being stripped away. Every day. It gets worse and worse. Unity is our only hope.
So what is it you envision? Anarchy? No Law Enforcement at all? Do you agree with Democrats that we should be sending "Social Workers" into potentially deadly situations? You clearly disagree with how things are right now but you just want to cry about it and you don't actually have a solution. Actually, it seems like you are letting your feelings control your thought process which is exactly what Democrats do.
If you think enforcing the law is "infighting," then you're a fucking idiot.
Yeah, I'm "literally ok with giving LETHAL AUTHORITY to government employees..." What the fuck do you think the guns are for? What's your alternative, dipshit: no police or policing? You one of the fucking morons that want to send counselors to 911 calls? Part of having a nation under law is law. Part of it is enforcement. Other than self-defense, defense of others, and the collective response to tyranny, government has to have a monopoly on the legitimate use of force (constrained by law, obviously), or you don't have any fucking law.
It's "Minority Report," retard. Your sense of temporal/chronological linearity is interesting. They tried to pull him over AFTER he blew through the stoplight; how is that "pre-crime?" Then he sped off, recklessly endangering other civilians. Again, how is that "pre-crime?" You want a list of the innocents killed by morons driving recklessly? What, exactly, does it take for you to realize that the guy driving the truck is responsible for his own death; hell, at those speeds, he didn't need the police involved in order to run real risk of it.
How the fuck is it immoral, let alone "completely immoral?" Just exactly how fucking retarded are you, like AOC retarded or full-blown Maxine Waters retarded? Was the guy in the truck your dad or something? You're as bad as the retards rioting over Jacob Blake. The police didn't set out to kill him, and they have the responsibility to enforce the law and apprehend violators, and to intercede when people are endangering others, against the law. You know who could have prevented the entire situation? That stupid motherfucker driving the truck.
Speaking of stupid motherfuckers:
a: It wasn't murder; the word has a meaning, and that ain't it.
b: What the fuck does "culture" have to do with it?
Exactly, if the police just gave up chase when people tried to flee due to potential public safety risks. Then you would see a lot more people trying to evade the police because you've effectively normalized the behavior. Example, changing lanes or turning without a blinker is illegal but it's rare that you get pulled over for it so you see lots of people doing it without a second thought. (For the record, I try to always use my blinker because I hate it when other people don't.)
Same. Trying not to kill one another by accident out there; social contract, and all.
Well.... You're both fucking stupid.
Apparently.... You guys are both literally ok with giving LETHAL AUTHORITY to government employees that can... In the heat-of-the-moment... Decide whether or not a person will or will not commit a crime against another human.
Sickening.
It's no different than monitory report. "Pre Crime"
It's immoral. Completely immoral. Not only that... It's unconstitutional.
Motherfuckers... You CANNOT see the future. Neither can the murderous cop that decided to act upon his apparent clarivoyance.
Our culture is dying. Our rights are being stripped away. Every day. It gets worse and worse. Unity is our only hope.
Can we please stop in-fighting?
So what is it you envision? Anarchy? No Law Enforcement at all? Do you agree with Democrats that we should be sending "Social Workers" into potentially deadly situations? You clearly disagree with how things are right now but you just want to cry about it and you don't actually have a solution. Actually, it seems like you are letting your feelings control your thought process which is exactly what Democrats do.
If you think enforcing the law is "infighting," then you're a fucking idiot.
Yeah, I'm "literally ok with giving LETHAL AUTHORITY to government employees..." What the fuck do you think the guns are for? What's your alternative, dipshit: no police or policing? You one of the fucking morons that want to send counselors to 911 calls? Part of having a nation under law is law. Part of it is enforcement. Other than self-defense, defense of others, and the collective response to tyranny, government has to have a monopoly on the legitimate use of force (constrained by law, obviously), or you don't have any fucking law.
It's "Minority Report," retard. Your sense of temporal/chronological linearity is interesting. They tried to pull him over AFTER he blew through the stoplight; how is that "pre-crime?" Then he sped off, recklessly endangering other civilians. Again, how is that "pre-crime?" You want a list of the innocents killed by morons driving recklessly? What, exactly, does it take for you to realize that the guy driving the truck is responsible for his own death; hell, at those speeds, he didn't need the police involved in order to run real risk of it.
How the fuck is it immoral, let alone "completely immoral?" Just exactly how fucking retarded are you, like AOC retarded or full-blown Maxine Waters retarded? Was the guy in the truck your dad or something? You're as bad as the retards rioting over Jacob Blake. The police didn't set out to kill him, and they have the responsibility to enforce the law and apprehend violators, and to intercede when people are endangering others, against the law. You know who could have prevented the entire situation? That stupid motherfucker driving the truck.
Speaking of stupid motherfuckers: a: It wasn't murder; the word has a meaning, and that ain't it. b: What the fuck does "culture" have to do with it?