3041
Comments (200)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
50
tombombadil 50 points ago +50 / -0

Here is why: Public education is a socialist economic system. All teachers are paid the same regardless of how good of a job they do.

We need to take money from the 80% of teachers who suck at their job and give it to the 20% who actually perform. Then watch how suddenly the teachers who suck start putting in the effort in to be good at teaching.

14
Carry_Your_Name 14 points ago +15 / -1

They are more like babysitters. One of them admitted it in a leaked zoom meeting.

3
CucksForTheDonald 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their most important short-term economic function is babysitting. Without the kids having somewhere to go, parents can't go to work. If parents can't go to work, families starve.

The long-term function is education and fostering of social skills, and here we need teachers who do that well. But the babysitting is super important and if the teachers won't do it, then in the short-term, society is better off replacing them with anyone who will.

2
rangoon03 2 points ago +2 / -0

And as a kid, why are you told you have to go to school? To learn and be smart so you can get a good job so you can work, raise a family, and not starve lol. And have kids go to school. And the cycle repeats..