I mean, if the workers aren't happy with their pay, they could always start their own business if they have no desire to improve on and learn new skill sets to move up through the ladder of other people's businesses. No one is FORCED to choose being a worker over being their own boss.
No they can't. If they try, assuming they make it through all the bullshit already on the books, and survive the lawfare that inevitably follows, the CEO will just "donate" a few million to get a law passed that makes their business illegal.
This is the problem I have. I don’t care if a ceo or whoever makes more than me. I really don’t. I care about the influence they buy with politicians, and vice versa.
Agree. And the bigger problem with that is that politicians instead of serving the people are willing to be bought out. It doesn't even always take money to buy out politicians so what CEOs make also is not the full picture of this issue. There are lower and middle income people who are also willing to be bought off in numerous ways and will do whatever dirty deed the politician needs.
They can't start their own business? What is stopping many of us from forming our own companies other than ourselves?
Why are so many focused on what others have? Why arent they focused on what THEY have and what they can do to achieve more, if that's their desire, without assuming they don't have more because someone else happens to have more? It's a stupid idea.
Corporatism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labour, military, scientific, or guild associations, on the basis of their common interests.
You're fact checking me with Snopes, wew fucking lad. And it even fucking says pretty much the same thing I am, that your state education has failed you and you don't know the meaning of the word "corporatism":
Most importantly, though, the meme’s central point revolves around a common misunderstanding of what “corporatism” was in Mussolini’s fascism and a conflation with the modern capitalist “corporation,” most likely borne out of the similarity between the words.
Corporatism (“corporativismo” in Italian) was one of the cornerstone principles in Mussolini’s fascism, and had to do with the way society and the economy would be organized, with state power at the head of a system of guilds or corporations (“corporazione”) representing each major industry.
Most importantly, though, the meme’s central point revolves around a common misunderstanding of what “corporatism” was in Mussolini’s fascism and a conflation with the modern capitalist “corporation,” most likely borne out of the similarity between the words.
Corporatism (“corporativismo” in Italian) was one of the cornerstone principles in Mussolini’s fascism, and had to do with the way society and the economy would be organized, with state power at the head of a system of guilds or corporations (“corporazione”) representing each major industry.
with state power at the head of a system of guilds or corporations (“corporazione”) representing each major industry.
Facebook, twitter, YouTube - control of social circles.
legacy media - control of information flow to the laymen
your isp's who lobby to control competition by putting an insurmountable mountain of walls in front of people. so much so that starting one up costs millions of dollars in paperwork and examination of those very controls to make sure you don't "break the rules" before you even get things rolling.
Banks who don't just hold the money but tell you where it can go even when you want to spend it on a completely legal and legitimate business
corporations who handle almost all commerce and will fucking strangle you when they can because they can throw money at the government to do so.
that is a merger of state and govt power. this is not flow of commerce this is law manipulation using powers willing to play ball. playing word games gets around none of the fact that this operation is inherently anti-competitive.
Not understanding interplay of long game, cause and effect, precedent, potential is disturbing. is it capitalism when the government shuts everyone down except these very same corporations in order to further solidify their power and make government control of a smaller number of organized corporations easier? thus leading to that exact scenario.
You copy that entire thing and don't even proceed to think about how that can be extrapolated upon further.
you are using a very obvious piece of double think meant to make you go "oh yeah that sounds right" and pacify you.
It might help to point out that the CEOs of today's corporations are managing companies that are 1000 times the size of the average company 50 years ago with outlets and sales around the globe and dozens if not hundreds of brands.
Meanwhile a guy packing stuff into boxes is still just packing stuff into boxes.
If you want to stop this sort of thing, stop buying products from these globohom omegacorps and start looking for products from American small businesses.
I mean, if the workers aren't happy with their pay, they could always start their own business if they have no desire to improve on and learn new skill sets to move up through the ladder of other people's businesses. No one is FORCED to choose being a worker over being their own boss.
That Sarcasm or are you just a Libertarian?
It isnt sarcasm and nor am I a libertarian.
No they can't. If they try, assuming they make it through all the bullshit already on the books, and survive the lawfare that inevitably follows, the CEO will just "donate" a few million to get a law passed that makes their business illegal.
This is the problem I have. I don’t care if a ceo or whoever makes more than me. I really don’t. I care about the influence they buy with politicians, and vice versa.
Agree. And the bigger problem with that is that politicians instead of serving the people are willing to be bought out. It doesn't even always take money to buy out politicians so what CEOs make also is not the full picture of this issue. There are lower and middle income people who are also willing to be bought off in numerous ways and will do whatever dirty deed the politician needs.
Politicians ARE the problem.
They can't start their own business? What is stopping many of us from forming our own companies other than ourselves?
Why are so many focused on what others have? Why arent they focused on what THEY have and what they can do to achieve more, if that's their desire, without assuming they don't have more because someone else happens to have more? It's a stupid idea.
That's capitalism, not corporatism.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
"Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."
-Benito Mussolini (founding father of Fascism)
Your state education has failed you. You are indoctrinated. Go educate yourself.
Sauce:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fascism-corporations-corporatism-dictionary/#:~:text=Corporatism%20%28%E2%80%9Ccorporativismo%E2%80%9D%20in%20Italian%29%20was%20one%20of%20the,guilds%20or%20corporations%20%28%E2%80%9Ccorporazione%E2%80%9D%29%20representing%20each%20major%20industry.
You're fact checking me with Snopes, wew fucking lad. And it even fucking says pretty much the same thing I am, that your state education has failed you and you don't know the meaning of the word "corporatism":
yup. that quite literally describes current socio-economic powers in present form. fascism is corporatism and we are on the verge of entering it
I wish I lived in your reality, but instead we just have capitalism.
a merger of state and corporate powers is not capitalism. that is a reality you mongrel
oh a good quote. im glad copy paste is so hard.
with state power at the head of a system of guilds or corporations (“corporazione”) representing each major industry.
legacy media - control of information flow to the laymen
your isp's who lobby to control competition by putting an insurmountable mountain of walls in front of people. so much so that starting one up costs millions of dollars in paperwork and examination of those very controls to make sure you don't "break the rules" before you even get things rolling.
Banks who don't just hold the money but tell you where it can go even when you want to spend it on a completely legal and legitimate business
corporations who handle almost all commerce and will fucking strangle you when they can because they can throw money at the government to do so.
that is a merger of state and govt power. this is not flow of commerce this is law manipulation using powers willing to play ball. playing word games gets around none of the fact that this operation is inherently anti-competitive.
Not understanding interplay of long game, cause and effect, precedent, potential is disturbing. is it capitalism when the government shuts everyone down except these very same corporations in order to further solidify their power and make government control of a smaller number of organized corporations easier? thus leading to that exact scenario.
You copy that entire thing and don't even proceed to think about how that can be extrapolated upon further.
you are using a very obvious piece of double think meant to make you go "oh yeah that sounds right" and pacify you.
It might help to point out that the CEOs of today's corporations are managing companies that are 1000 times the size of the average company 50 years ago with outlets and sales around the globe and dozens if not hundreds of brands.
Meanwhile a guy packing stuff into boxes is still just packing stuff into boxes.
If you want to stop this sort of thing, stop buying products from these globohom omegacorps and start looking for products from American small businesses.
It’s higher than 320-1. Closer to 1000