The funny thing is, those of us in the top 30% get so much pussy, that we really treat them like shit now. And it just pulls them in even stronger. It’s fucked up, but whatever. I didn’t invent the game.
Along with the quiet, you get freedom, peace, keep your own stuff & money, no BS question/interrogations, and more. Want sex, grab a slut and bust a nut. Then, get back to your own business. Women offer nothing of value.
Not sure I follow your logic here, amigo... By MGTOW, you have removed yourself from the middle of that spectrum (and playing by the womens rules) and put yourself in your own category. You can achieve success and money and fame and fortune by your own measurement. This will bring you all the puss (or happiness) you could ever want.
But the chart is still interesting, because it shows the Chads get lots of women but generally have few or even no children.
Your MGTOW system works for you, but does little for social health or fertility, so it has no future. (I am not arguing with your personal decisions, which are entirely your business.)
This is Islam without the wives and children. Polygamy, but rather temporary.
Islam sneers at us and says, next to you, we are tender-hearted toward women. Unlike you, we actually keep and feed the ugly ones. And they get at least some children, well supposedly. You are also polygamists, like us, but with no obligation to feed them.
To have a birthrate we will have to be good Christians or good muslims but not what we are now. Which is Chads. We have no demographic future as Chads.
To put it another way, we must harness the fertility of the unattractive. And the only way to do that is to send them back to their natural mates and stay monogamous ourselves. Of course they will howl. Of course they will see that as a demotion. It is one. It is also reality. We must frustrate nature. Nature commands them to try for the best man, a little tiny bit of his time, even with a kick in the pants afterward. Nature only cares about good genes, not kicks or dignity.
But nature never counted on Margaret Sanger. (Who was Irish.)
Edit: and we must harness the fertility of the attractive too. Our gorgeous women don't need babies to keep the interest of men, and our unattractive women won't look at the men who might have given them babies. So, no babies anywhere. Bad.
This idea implies that you inherently feel you have no chance at getting a good looking woman. But if you focus on self, make money and work out, the women (yes, the good looking young ones) will beat a path to your door (if that is what a man wants). Women are opportunists. They will see you as a great financial provider and fuck you regardless of what you look like, how old and fugly you are, or any other issue. Don't be stuck in the mindset of being relegated to the middle of the curve. You can do better than 90% of the other males (especially the simps, betas and cucks) by simply focusing on self. The rest will follow.
BTW, I am by no means at the top of the Chad charts. But I have followed these simple rules of MGTOW and self first - This has paid off dividends. Now, I know I do not have to settle for some skank or her BS. And you can do it too, amigo.
But I am talking about Society. And our stinking birthrate.
I get your point that the middle could ease itself upward, if it tried. That is true. That is true for women also. And a very good idea for everybody.
If that is all people want to take from this chart, fine. Improve yourself.
In an earlier day, there was a right to be ordinary. Especially in youth, everybody had a little charm, and it was enough. Marriages happened, and divorce was unusual, so those matings were life long. Were they bored later? Some were. But the usual events occurred: a child or two arrived, and even four kids was completely normal. People often "tried for a boy" or "tried for a girl" if they had two of one sex. Maybe tried a couple of times then gave up. It was considered normal and nice to have both sexes. For balance.
That was another time. Though only a handful of decades ago. It seems like Ancient Egypt.
I am looking at BIRTHS. Should our nation go extinct? Because it is, under this system.
Well, perfect virtue never existed. But this is what showed. The basic structure, although a little blurry around the edges in practice. It is still valid. This is how all mammalian herds work.
The funny thing is, those of us in the top 30% get so much pussy, that we really treat them like shit now. And it just pulls them in even stronger. It’s fucked up, but whatever. I didn’t invent the game.
No, you did not invent it. But only you (guys like you) can stop this undignified and unworthy state of affairs.
George Washington refused a third term. He would have been president for life, he was so loved. But he knew better and said no.
I disagree. Some people were not meant to breed. Let the Alphas do their duty and pump out based babies to keep this culture alive.
They don't. They are so alpha they can choose to not be bothered with the patter of little feet.
MGTOW for life.
But they aren't all having a nice time, under that system. A few are, and most are sort of making do.
Maybe you are saying, some like the quiet.
Along with the quiet, you get freedom, peace, keep your own stuff & money, no BS question/interrogations, and more. Want sex, grab a slut and bust a nut. Then, get back to your own business. Women offer nothing of value.
Well that is the other end of the spectrum. In the middle is where most people lie. Bell curve.
Not sure I follow your logic here, amigo... By MGTOW, you have removed yourself from the middle of that spectrum (and playing by the womens rules) and put yourself in your own category. You can achieve success and money and fame and fortune by your own measurement. This will bring you all the puss (or happiness) you could ever want.
So maybe you are at the top with the Chads.
But the chart is still interesting, because it shows the Chads get lots of women but generally have few or even no children.
Your MGTOW system works for you, but does little for social health or fertility, so it has no future. (I am not arguing with your personal decisions, which are entirely your business.)
This is Islam without the wives and children. Polygamy, but rather temporary.
Islam sneers at us and says, next to you, we are tender-hearted toward women. Unlike you, we actually keep and feed the ugly ones. And they get at least some children, well supposedly. You are also polygamists, like us, but with no obligation to feed them.
To have a birthrate we will have to be good Christians or good muslims but not what we are now. Which is Chads. We have no demographic future as Chads.
To put it another way, we must harness the fertility of the unattractive. And the only way to do that is to send them back to their natural mates and stay monogamous ourselves. Of course they will howl. Of course they will see that as a demotion. It is one. It is also reality. We must frustrate nature. Nature commands them to try for the best man, a little tiny bit of his time, even with a kick in the pants afterward. Nature only cares about good genes, not kicks or dignity.
But nature never counted on Margaret Sanger. (Who was Irish.)
Edit: and we must harness the fertility of the attractive too. Our gorgeous women don't need babies to keep the interest of men, and our unattractive women won't look at the men who might have given them babies. So, no babies anywhere. Bad.
This idea implies that you inherently feel you have no chance at getting a good looking woman. But if you focus on self, make money and work out, the women (yes, the good looking young ones) will beat a path to your door (if that is what a man wants). Women are opportunists. They will see you as a great financial provider and fuck you regardless of what you look like, how old and fugly you are, or any other issue. Don't be stuck in the mindset of being relegated to the middle of the curve. You can do better than 90% of the other males (especially the simps, betas and cucks) by simply focusing on self. The rest will follow. BTW, I am by no means at the top of the Chad charts. But I have followed these simple rules of MGTOW and self first - This has paid off dividends. Now, I know I do not have to settle for some skank or her BS. And you can do it too, amigo.
Sounds as if you have your life figured out.
But I am talking about Society. And our stinking birthrate.
I get your point that the middle could ease itself upward, if it tried. That is true. That is true for women also. And a very good idea for everybody.
If that is all people want to take from this chart, fine. Improve yourself.
In an earlier day, there was a right to be ordinary. Especially in youth, everybody had a little charm, and it was enough. Marriages happened, and divorce was unusual, so those matings were life long. Were they bored later? Some were. But the usual events occurred: a child or two arrived, and even four kids was completely normal. People often "tried for a boy" or "tried for a girl" if they had two of one sex. Maybe tried a couple of times then gave up. It was considered normal and nice to have both sexes. For balance.
That was another time. Though only a handful of decades ago. It seems like Ancient Egypt.
I am looking at BIRTHS. Should our nation go extinct? Because it is, under this system.
This is bullshit. Talk about white washing history.
Well, perfect virtue never existed. But this is what showed. The basic structure, although a little blurry around the edges in practice. It is still valid. This is how all mammalian herds work.
That is not a compliment.