^This. The lgbtqleft always mythologizes violence against trans people but when you think about it logically, what is the most likely scenario they are being attacked? A) they are being attacked at random on the street because some pedestrian can both quickly ID them as trans and has such outward animosity that they will just go beat up a complete stranger, or B) people are freaked out when they find their potential sexual partner has been lying about their identity and is trying to entrap them when they found out the truth? Heterosexual men don't want to have sex with other men and get very angry when someone tries to force them into a sexual encounter they don't want. That's called rape. Rapists catch assbeatings.
Peter Boghossian, James A. Lindsay, and Helen Pluckrose proved they could start with a conclusion, then work their way back using their language to justify anything they want in peer reviewed academic journals. They literally got a chapter from Mein Kampf accepted through peer review.
Reddit bans transphobic 'SuperStraight' subreddit for 'promoting hate'
It's just a rubber stamp at this point.
Edit:
Here's from the ban page itself.
This community has been banned
This community was banned for promoting hate towards a marginalized or vulnerable group. The community had become increasingly exclusionary with hateful content that is counter to its original satirical intent and was in violation of our policies.
They took over the L,G, and the B. If gender doesn’t exist and “super” is transphobic then there is no male or female, no gay or straight, to many genders for anyone to be “bi” anything. Everyone has to be trans or pansexual or they’re a bigot.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
God I love seeing their language weaponized against them.
My money is on a Super-Pissed Super Lesbian who is sick of trannies calling her hateful because she don't want no dick.
^This. The lgbtqleft always mythologizes violence against trans people but when you think about it logically, what is the most likely scenario they are being attacked? A) they are being attacked at random on the street because some pedestrian can both quickly ID them as trans and has such outward animosity that they will just go beat up a complete stranger, or B) people are freaked out when they find their potential sexual partner has been lying about their identity and is trying to entrap them when they found out the truth? Heterosexual men don't want to have sex with other men and get very angry when someone tries to force them into a sexual encounter they don't want. That's called rape. Rapists catch assbeatings.
Weird! You mean a straight male might be driven into a rage when he goes down on what he thought was a woman and finds a cock?
Say it ain’t so!
How about when a straight male finds out that he’s been fucking a post op, mentally ill, man?
It can’t be true!
Gotta watch out for that brow bone and Adam's apple
Don’t fuck strangers....and fuck the person after you get to know them.
For sure. I think most guys know what to look for, but some don’t.
Peter Boghossian, James A. Lindsay, and Helen Pluckrose proved they could start with a conclusion, then work their way back using their language to justify anything they want in peer reviewed academic journals. They literally got a chapter from Mein Kampf accepted through peer review.
Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLHyNSlsz449SOhzpo7ClMEKe9WkXt5GO
Ooh bookmarked, I will be checking that out.
👏me👏too👏
This is how we win. Hijack the engine room and drive the damn thing over a cliff.
There are lots of examples, except they're usually labeled as "hate crimes" when the victim kicks the shit out of their rapist.
I don't understand this particular variant of clown world, but I am enjoying the meltdowns nevertheless.
Thank you!
I know Reddit is well beyond the point of pretending to be politically neutral, but does anyone know the reasoning they gave on banning the sub?
Reddit bans transphobic 'SuperStraight' subreddit for 'promoting hate'
It's just a rubber stamp at this point.
Edit:
Here's from the ban page itself.
This community has been banned
This community was banned for promoting hate towards a marginalized or vulnerable group. The community had become increasingly exclusionary with hateful content that is counter to its original satirical intent and was in violation of our policies.
FIERCE!
Super straight only has a bigger voice because the trannies took over the LG movement.
They took over the L,G, and the B. If gender doesn’t exist and “super” is transphobic then there is no male or female, no gay or straight, to many genders for anyone to be “bi” anything. Everyone has to be trans or pansexual or they’re a bigot.
This is all just confusing. Don’t make me question who I am. Banning online and banning in life are different animals.
Fucking clown world
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
I love the term superlesbian
#WEW FUCKING LAD
So is so frickin' awesome, Julian.
Typical "do as I say, not as I do" libtard logic
i’m thinking about going back to 10000 karma account to nuke it
This is priceless! Babylon Bee-level lulz <3 <3 <3