Yeah now that they're safely in the minority with no power they can go back to pretending to fight against the left again. Knowing that they won't actually have to stop any of it because deep down they agree with it..
Ask all those dim little sausages on the Left side of the Senate, Mitt the Shit, Sasse the Ass, etc.
They all really enjoy a graham cracker bet ween episodes of Impeach Trump and Fuck America!😠
Reality is that he's lying that he disagrees with it. He has to say that he disagrees with it in order to get votes but he supports the 1.9 trillion dollar stimulus bill.. that's why he wants the Republican Party in the minority. So that he can rant and rail against it and pretend to oppose it knowing that when push comes to show if he won't be able to stop it even if he tried so he can pretend to fight it whilee safely knowing that it will still pass..
Thats the Republican scam.. and that's why once they're in power you see them never really doing all that
that's how they were able to have a majority in all three branches of government and yet they still managed to cave to the Democrats spending bills and keep it Obamacare and basically the only thing that they did that Democrats didn't want was passing tax cuts for the rich..
Because deep down they agree with Democrat policies. But as Republicans running in red States they can't admit it. Just like Mitt Romney agreeing with BLM when they actually have to have a political career they can't admit that they agree with Democrats and so they have to do a shifty little political maneuver.. pretending to fight against it when they know that they can't and then if they ever have the ability to they have to find ways to distract you so that they don't actually have to do anything..
We need real Republicans and real conservatives in Congress..
It's the never ending fake outrage we expect to hear from the cucks in the GOP. They put out a "strongly worded statement" after the fact but do jack shit when it really matters and they could actually do something to represent their constituents.
This is literally equivalent to the Republicans in the Senate refusing to deal with Section 230, but then literally going on Twitter after that and complaining about censorship.
Whoever desires liberty, should understand these vital facts, viz.: 1. That every man who puts money into the hands of a “government” (so called), puts into its hands a sword which will be used against himself, to extort more money from him, and also to keep him in subjection to its arbitrary will. 2. That those who will take his money, without his consent, in the first place, will use it for his further robbery and enslavement, if he presumes to resist their demands in the future.
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government?
Individuals protecting their own property and working together to protect each other on a voluntary basis.
Without a central command a country not being in the state of control by domestic forces would be even harder for foreign forces to control (by replacing the existing power structure)
Much as the internet was designed to be resilient in the face of a nuclear attack, a decentralized populace would be more resilient to invasions than one that is already subjugated under a central authority.
You aren't even putting effort into your fully intentional lies and manipulations or meaningless rhetoric, shill. Though it may work well to distract. Such as your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
And thus you continue with your distractions, for you haven't yet at any point even attempted answering how one will have any chance of protecting their country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government, despite arguing that no government is viable or meaningful in any way, and you made that claim. And your distraction might work well to distract. Such as your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So yet again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
And here you begin spamming a question in order to continue with your distraction and also evade me fully rightly calling you out for your shilling and lies. And you still haven't yet at any point even attempted answering how one will have any chance of protecting their country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government, despite arguing that no government is viable or meaningful in any way, and you made that claim. And your distraction might work well. Such as distracting from your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So yet still again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
But will you replace it (for instance with something smaller and much more robust, reactive, etc. to infiltration and subversion by groups that consider themselves extremely or more evil according to their own views, values and perspectives)? Or will you somehow, someway attempt to not have a government, nor a military, paving the way for (among many issues) foreign conquest, enslavement and extermination?
Rick Scott is a do-nothing RINO who was a failure as governor of my great state, Florida. He made millions as governor and did nothing for the people. Very very shameful.
Fuck him. He still never answered for his no vote on arizona electoral college. He tried to jump the maga train by voting for PA objections. He's a snake and political opportunist. I hope he gets primaried or removed one way or another, but Rubio needs to go first.
100% he's going to beg for endorsement from Trump in 2024.
If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible.
Exactly. We need leadership to not just lead but fund massive protests. Imagine if Trump said "I'll take care of any legal fees for the thousands of people who do a tax revolt" but nah, instead we send him money to put more people into the same broken system that can't be fixed from the inside.
Scott isn't a full blown rino...he just bows down to their perceived power. Its time for him and lil Marco to be primaried. Give me Gaetz and GEOTUS as my two senators.
I mean... this guy did oversee the largest Medicare fraud ever - which was also a massive waste of tax payer money. (And enrich himself in the process)
It's a > 5,000 page bill. I'm hearing that only about 9% of it is actual Covid relief and the rest is bullshit. I'm searching for key sections, but it's so big that surely no one read it.
This guy wrecked Florida's unemployment. I thought he was good until I saw the outcome of some of his terrible policies. But more than that he refused to stand up for the constitution and what is right. I will be voting against him hopefully in the primaries but if not I'll vote him out anyway. I'm done with RINO's
Fuck Off Backstabbing POS . I know these Radicals Moves are No Surprise to you Rinos
Yeah now that they're safely in the minority with no power they can go back to pretending to fight against the left again. Knowing that they won't actually have to stop any of it because deep down they agree with it..
And other things
Ask all those dim little sausages on the Left side of the Senate, Mitt the Shit, Sasse the Ass, etc. They all really enjoy a graham cracker bet ween episodes of Impeach Trump and Fuck America!😠
That sums up the Republican Party to a T.
YUP. IT IS FAKE OUTRAGE.
Agree, fuck Rick Scott...Little Marco too.
Came here to say this.
Ty.
What did you do about it, Scott?
Who gave up the seats, Scott?
Reality is that he's lying that he disagrees with it. He has to say that he disagrees with it in order to get votes but he supports the 1.9 trillion dollar stimulus bill.. that's why he wants the Republican Party in the minority. So that he can rant and rail against it and pretend to oppose it knowing that when push comes to show if he won't be able to stop it even if he tried so he can pretend to fight it whilee safely knowing that it will still pass..
Thats the Republican scam.. and that's why once they're in power you see them never really doing all that
that's how they were able to have a majority in all three branches of government and yet they still managed to cave to the Democrats spending bills and keep it Obamacare and basically the only thing that they did that Democrats didn't want was passing tax cuts for the rich..
Because deep down they agree with Democrat policies. But as Republicans running in red States they can't admit it. Just like Mitt Romney agreeing with BLM when they actually have to have a political career they can't admit that they agree with Democrats and so they have to do a shifty little political maneuver.. pretending to fight against it when they know that they can't and then if they ever have the ability to they have to find ways to distract you so that they don't actually have to do anything..
We need real Republicans and real conservatives in Congress..
They're professional losers.
We need winners. That's why they hated President Trump so much.
the ironic thing is that stimulus is going to be used to buy a lot of guns. can't wait to get mine.
Fuck you, Scott. Trump stuck his neck out to get you elected and you stabbed him in the back when he needed you. We needed you.
Scott ended up costing American taxpayers a fortune! Should have stood up for the American people when the election was stolen.
Rick Scott voted against certifying Xiden electors. Fake News.
Rick Scott did nothing to stop the steal. This is just political theater.
The latest episode in syndicated reruns of "Republicans Feigning Outrage".
AKA uniparty kabuki
Resulting in the public getting bukake
You win this thread
Rick Scott voted against certifying Xiden electors. Fake News.
Scott is swamp. He is just yapping because his party is out of power.
It's the never ending fake outrage we expect to hear from the cucks in the GOP. They put out a "strongly worded statement" after the fact but do jack shit when it really matters and they could actually do something to represent their constituents.
This is literally equivalent to the Republicans in the Senate refusing to deal with Section 230, but then literally going on Twitter after that and complaining about censorship.
Thats a blessing in disguise. Section 230 is a huge censorship stopgap for this site.
Not if you have some liberal views
If section 230 is removed the feds will take this and all forums down.
Scott is a shameless RINO prick!
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
Individuals protecting their own property and working together to protect each other on a voluntary basis.
Without a central command a country not being in the state of control by domestic forces would be even harder for foreign forces to control (by replacing the existing power structure)
Much as the internet was designed to be resilient in the face of a nuclear attack, a decentralized populace would be more resilient to invasions than one that is already subjugated under a central authority.
https://mises.org/library/myth-national-defense-essays-theory-and-history-security-production
You aren't even putting effort into your fully intentional lies and manipulations or meaningless rhetoric, shill. Though it may work well to distract. Such as your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
What specific form and role of government do you find to be necessary and legitimate?
And thus you continue with your distractions, for you haven't yet at any point even attempted answering how one will have any chance of protecting their country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government, despite arguing that no government is viable or meaningful in any way, and you made that claim. And your distraction might work well to distract. Such as your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So yet again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
What specific form and role of government do you find to be necessary and legitimate?
And here you begin spamming a question in order to continue with your distraction and also evade me fully rightly calling you out for your shilling and lies. And you still haven't yet at any point even attempted answering how one will have any chance of protecting their country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government, despite arguing that no government is viable or meaningful in any way, and you made that claim. And your distraction might work well. Such as distracting from your promotion of a professor that you yourself acknowledges advocated for "commercial trading of children".
So yet still again, given that you continue distracting among other tactics and tricks and that it is still relevant:
But as I have written elsewhere, whether this holds depends very much on what kind of specific government he is dealing with. And how will you have any chance of protecting your country from death and destruction without an at least somewhat effective military and government? The nations that survived and thrived in history tended to have governments, states, people, etc. that were very good at waging war and defending their countries reg. military force.
And instead of completely giving up on the concept of government and letting only leftists control and use government for their purpose, would it not be much better for the people of the USA to take back their government, clean it up and reform it, and deal with the groups that infiltrated, subverted and took over the government of the USA? You, the shill, who have previously argued for no government (such as here https://patriots.win/p/12hRj4ORRX/x/c/4Dx5uPLB4Fg , https://archive.li/gyDmi ), while never once even attempted to meaningfully argue for it, including how a nation and country is supposed to defend itself effectively and with some hope of survival against foreign and external threats, both direct (like military force) and indirect threats (like mass immigration of people that are much less than the best of their origin and directly hostile to the given country and its ways and people). And who also compared the USA to Islam: https://patriots.win/p/12hkhqmyBu/x/c/4DyMGuz1z69 , https://archive.li/Lw6Iy , despite how extremely enslaving (completely overshadowing the slavery period of the USA) and genocidal (including in modern times, see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_genocide ) Islam was and is. And you have also multiple times in the past promoted Murray N. Rothbard ( see for instance https://archive.li/8Pzqv ), despite you yourself acknowledging that Murray N. Rothbard promoted the trading and seeming enslavement of children (see for instance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_Rothbard#Children's_rights_and_parental_obligations ). (was Murray N. Rothbard against government because some governments punish child rape and child slavery?).
Abolish the government.
But will you replace it (for instance with something smaller and much more robust, reactive, etc. to infiltration and subversion by groups that consider themselves extremely or more evil according to their own views, values and perspectives)? Or will you somehow, someway attempt to not have a government, nor a military, paving the way for (among many issues) foreign conquest, enslavement and extermination?
Local governments. Decentralized.
One could make an argument in favour of that.
(do note that I have not downvoted anyone commenting in this submission).
Rick Scott is a do-nothing RINO who was a failure as governor of my great state, Florida. He made millions as governor and did nothing for the people. Very very shameful.
Rick Scott is just an elitist fuckhole.
As a Floridian, I will be happy to primary him out if there is a MAGA person stepping up.
After this cuck stole millions from Medicare with his business. Pure RINO and worthless.
Fuck him. He still never answered for his no vote on arizona electoral college. He tried to jump the maga train by voting for PA objections. He's a snake and political opportunist. I hope he gets primaried or removed one way or another, but Rubio needs to go first.
100% he's going to beg for endorsement from Trump in 2024.
They openly hate us.
STOP paying taxes!
Then I get arrested and my family is left with no one to take care of them
It needs to be organized.
This is why the police are the BIGGEST problem, along with the media.
Find a way. Or emigrate. And stop consooming.
People are too scared of the govt. And/or there is no organization. Trump shilling for federal govt seats and RINOs isn't the leadership we need.
Exactly. We need leadership to not just lead but fund massive protests. Imagine if Trump said "I'll take care of any legal fees for the thousands of people who do a tax revolt" but nah, instead we send him money to put more people into the same broken system that can't be fixed from the inside.
Turning a blind eye to election fraud will prove to be even more costlier for this bald headed cuck
Lol. bullshit.
You just certified a fraudulent election. This is a fart in the wind comparatively.
oh just wait, this rollercoaster is still climbing the hill.
Talk talk talk. Fuck off traitor.
I just want to say one thing right now to all the Grandpedes who are reading this:
When your generation comes into power, declare national bankruptcy. Do not bear the burden these idiots are placing upon you!!!
We remember, Scott.
You can yammer now about this, but you put your dick in that pudding too when you didn't back Trump (or America.)
Reminder that he is on the "China Friendly Governors" list that Pompeo touted.
If this Piece of Shit would have stood up for the fraud the COVID fraud would be done by now. Fuck this piece of shit bullshiting scumbag.
They are so loud when they are in the minority. But they don’t say a thing when they’re in the majority.
Scott isn't a full blown rino...he just bows down to their perceived power. Its time for him and lil Marco to be primaried. Give me Gaetz and GEOTUS as my two senators.
Rick Scott is nothing more than a contracted agent for the Neo Marxists that wish to decimate our nation and our values. Fuck you.
Also, we know.
Fuck this RINO POS. They think we will forget. We won't.
Political theater. I’m sure Rick Scott got some Money for a pet project in the Bill. All the RINOs secretly supported it.
He should have supported President Trump. Another RINO, all talk and no trousers.
Why is this gay shit stickied you faggot mods? Scott is a faggot. Which one of you is blowing him?
Fuck you Rick Scott. You're fucking done here in Florida.
Wonk wonk... Rino shill. Whoa is me. Ass ho
With the lowest approval rating in the history of America, what has Con Gress got to lose? They care nothing for America for the citizens.
I don’t believe Rinos. They speak out on obvious bullshit and behind closed doors they’re establishment.
Somebody in Florida needs to go Maxine Waters on his ass
Rick Scott is one of the most shameful senators.
Fuck off Dick Snot. You sucked as governor and you are still a backstabber.
No, approving welfare without work being involved would be the most shameful, costly, political move ever made by Congress.
I mean... this guy did oversee the largest Medicare fraud ever - which was also a massive waste of tax payer money. (And enrich himself in the process)
But he does have a point.
It's a > 5,000 page bill. I'm hearing that only about 9% of it is actual Covid relief and the rest is bullshit. I'm searching for key sections, but it's so big that surely no one read it.
You gay bitch
This guy wrecked Florida's unemployment. I thought he was good until I saw the outcome of some of his terrible policies. But more than that he refused to stand up for the constitution and what is right. I will be voting against him hopefully in the primaries but if not I'll vote him out anyway. I'm done with RINO's
This guy scammed medicaid for hundreds of millions before being FL governor, in case anyone forgot or didn't know
Guys let the system crash. We dont want to be stuck with the hot potato.
Rick scott is upset about Rick scott costing us 1.9T from Rick scott's radical leftist bill?
Fuck you traitor
They'll continue looting the country of its coffers before the final collapse comes, but this stage is drawing toward a close.
Nothing compares to the Authorization of Force...