Governor's EO is that local government can't issue restrictive mask orders or law. Rhetorically, is a law that says there shall be no law abridging rights of the people, is that actually not a EO, but a restatement of our Constitutionally guaranteed rights?
Governor's EO is that local government can't issue restrictive mask orders or law. Rhetorically, is a law that says there shall be no law abridging rights of the people, is that actually not a EO, but a restatement of our Constitutionally guaranteed rights?
True, true, very true. His previous orders should never have been considered to have had force of law nor claimed it.