50
Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Overmann 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's a mistake to trust Islam. They've been destroying everything they've touched since Muhammad started killing people back in the day. Also calling it a Abrahamic religion is misleading, they aren't worshiping God, they worship baal.

It would be impossible to unite with them based on their beliefs as they are part of satan's army.

1
anon09 1 point ago +2 / -1

I never said to trust "islam", but one on one with a muslim is another story. tons of muslims and jews are coming to Christ right now.

2
Overmann 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's no difference to winning muslims to Christ than chinese. They could be both at the same time for that matter. The mission field is wide open, especially here in America. Any opportunity is a good one.

But this has nothing to do with banding together as Abrahamic religions. That is something that will never happen as history has proven.

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

sure, but it would be easier with someone who already follows the commandments than it would be with someone who lives to spite God and tells me to my face that they love satan.

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's my argument, is I don't care what country the person is from, or what "clan" or religion they were brought up in, its the heart that matters, and you can only discern that on an individual by individual basis.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
anon09 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol punishable by death where? that's a crime in western society.

0
anon09 0 points ago +2 / -2

and they are abrahamic, its literally the same book... slight variations. similar to how mormons and jehovah's witnesses call themselves christians.

2
Overmann 2 points ago +2 / -0

its literally the same book

Literally not the same book. Slight variations isn't even close. It's only called a Abrahamic religion because Muhammad wasn't creative enough to write an entire book of his own with an original backstory, so he took some things from the Bible.

Muhammad's goal was to conquer and control an empire. Creating a religion was his method to gain support and that worked surprisingly well.

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

muhammad came waaaaaaaay after the old testament was written

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

take out the newly added muhammad bit and you are left with the same book. just like mormonism, remove joseph smith and you're left with the same thing, take out l. ron hubbard, and you're left with the bible. the difference between all of them, including judaism, with christianity, is that we have the new testament, and believe the things Christ said, word for word.

1
Verrerogo 1 point ago +1 / -0

As for population, which matters:

There are about a 1.8 muslims, a 1.4 billion Chinese, 1.3 billion Indians, 1.2 billion Catholics. With other kinds of Christians lumped in with the Catholics, there are 2.1 billion Christians. The Jews - 16 million before W W II, and 14 million today. That's million with an M. No B.

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

quran*.... and have you read the torah? I have. and I was going to say its names that are different, otherwise the majority is the same. and it even says in the quran to read the bible if you want knowledge. they have the same creation story, with slight variances, they have the 10 commandments, with slight variances, etc, etc. correct me where I'm wrong.

1
anon09 1 point ago +1 / -0

and speaking of changed names, did you know the christians in baghdad refer to john the baptist as yahia-yohanna. does that change the word of God? no.