13
Comments (19)
sorted by:
4
Pepelosi 4 points ago +5 / -1

Nobody is perfect and we don’t have many voices that reach as wide as he can. I keep him.

3
Tom_Brett [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Literally the only thing i have ever seen I have disagreed with him was not diving into the dominion details. that was a chaotic time. Im sure the legal proceedings could have been done in a better way. Sydney Powell is not perfect and was taking on the establishment. Her judgement could have been in error.

from my limited understanding is that dominion was not as bad as some people said but in Michigan it definitely was where it was reversed.

The mail in ballots is the definitive proof of fraud.

Either way calling attention to the machines for future elections is a benefit.

3
justwow 3 points ago +5 / -2

Agreed -we need many voices.

2
SpookySpook 2 points ago +4 / -2

dont talk about Hunter and how he got rich off his father. Don't talk about the same thing happening to Pelosi's family. Just talk about the latest outrage slam tick tock and get excited for the next one

3
Tom_Brett [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

the dude did an expose on Tucker Carlson and brought in Tony Bobulinski.

sometimes you guys sound like the left where the only virtue Tucker could have signaled was condeming all of his past relations with biden while simultaneously murdering him

how can tucker redo his past?

1
SpookySpook 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easy, just because you are friends with them doesn't mean you should help them cover up

Low energy shilling btw

0
Tom_Brett [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m just a dude who thinks Tucker is effective my man

1
Olds77 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agreed. He always takes the easy stories and manipulates his audience. When we needed him he fucking bailed and he's on the same network, run by the same folks that keep cuckvuto and that other jackass, midget on Sundays. If he's your guilty pleasure, fine, but don't fucking bullshit us or yourself.

2
We_will_win 2 points ago +3 / -1

Get Tucker on a proper network and I'll watch him but if it's on FOX he can fly a kite! If you are still visiting FOX news at all you are part of the problem!

0
TrumpsBigBalls 0 points ago +1 / -1

you're not the sharpest tool in the shed bub

3
We_will_win 3 points ago +3 / -0

LOL If you watching FOX, YOU are part of the problem! If you can't even have the balls to ditch a network that actively worked against President Trump you are the either stupid or on the left!

2
TheNakedGenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Dominion-sized elephant in the room is the main reason why Tucker's lost trust. There's too much evidence of the Dominion system manipulatung the vote tally with foreign assistance NOT to investigate.

Plus, maybe it's from years of breathing the fumes at MSLSD, but Tucker's got to let up on his UFOtardation.

1
Error404 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think it's possible if anyone was brought back into the fold, he could be on the list. He nearly cucked as bad as his employer though.

1
Tom_Brett [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

We have to know not all is perfect.

Hell fucking Trump hired William Barr and a host of other neocons. Which he had to get them through congress.

If Trump got Ric Grenell, and pompeo through though he should have been able to get Rudy through

1
ColonelHughes 1 point ago +3 / -2

He defended hunter biden

0
TrumpsBigBalls 0 points ago +1 / -1

wtf, no he didn't you fucking moron

-2
Tom_Brett [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

he was transparent about his relationship with biden. he had tony bobulinski on. Hunter Biden is in pictures doing crack all over the internet. I dont what more you can mock out of that.

-1
Anaconda -1 points ago +4 / -5

fuck off cucker fluffer

he way before the disaster with the Q-tards wood and powell declared biden the winner and said there was not much theft and fraud and we all just need to 'get over it'

0
TrumpsBigBalls 0 points ago +1 / -1

who learned you how to spoke engrish