You can’t report accurate statistics if they imply the truth -fAcT cHeCkErS
(media.patriots.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
The math is right but it's racist to say it's true? Clownworld is real... lol
2+2=5. Anything else is racist
They are doing a switcheroo. They say "statistics are correct" - but those number are HARD MATH i.e. proof.
Those fact checkers are on Bill Gate's payroll. TrUsT the ScIeNcE, (and anon geeks, who get payed to destroy the truth because they hate humanity)
Freedom is slavery War is peace Biden is president
It's like the people that claim you're a science denier never post any science, or stats, or percentages, etc etc etc.
They'll never post any proof that the election was less than 100% rigged. Because that's what it was.
Everything is 1984. Sort of related, look at how YouTube is reporting likes and dislikes on all the White House YouTube videos. Pathetic.
https://patriots.win/p/12hkmU1Nb9/this-is-what-the-real-youtube-di/c/
Basically, every few hours YouTube deletes a bunch of seemingly real dislikes to make all White House videos look less hated than they actually are.
This is a slippery slo........ ahh fuck, just broke my neck
I think they inferred that.
They always say 'missing context' or 'mixed' and then go on to say everything claimed is 100% accurate. If anyone you know sites a 'fact check' just know that person is a fucking retard and you should stop talking to them. They can't be helped.
As if they get to tell you what the implications of facts are. As if you can't decide that for yourself.
Hey OP, got a copy of the upper image in higher res? great visual
I stole it from a sticky that was posted here tonight. It was in an article on the gateway pundit. I’ll go find the link
yeah came here to say that
Here you go
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Trump-Obama-Biden.jpg
The Implication? I’m not buying a boat.
So assuming that a large portion of those who voted FOR Obama were also motivated to vote AGAINST Trump (and didn't care who was running), and factoring in population growth, I think Biden probably got 70 million votes legitimately.
I really don't like it when people on this site try to claim that Biden only got like 50 million real votes, or use anecdotes like "I've never met a Biden supporter." Yeah, but we've all met Trump haters. Hate can be a powerful motivator.
The whole point of this graphic is to illustrate the demonstrable results of powerful motivation.
True, I definitely think there's evidence here. I'm just saying that we should at least give Biden "credit" for a larger number of legitimate votes than some people here tend to do.
The picture also fails to account for huge BLM rallies over the summer, which were essentially Democrat rallies.
I hope that we get to find out. I don't equate BLM or ANTIFA riots to Biden support Rallies, though.
Those people probably couldn't tell you the three branches of government and were most-likely just there for the cash.
Some of them were but there are a lot of "true believers." I met some of them on Twitter. A lot of radicals, but I did meet some people on Twitter who were supporters of BLM but at least willing to have a civil discussion with me.
It's impossible to say at this point what the actual vote totals were - which is the point. All of our elections should be 100% verifiable - they are far from that. I also think you are underestimating the sheer volume of vote fraud that Democrats are capable of. They have been stealing elections for a hundred and fifty years.