377
Comments (25)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
PraiseBeToScience [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

I added a second post telling him that his belief that being gay entitles him to some kind of veto over other people's sexual identity, and that his feelings that being 'more oppressed' allows you to exile someone from the community both can only be considered positions of PRIVILEGE.

Also I asked him why he has a problem with Superstraight 'because they aren't oppressed', but he is okay with aromantic being on the LGBT rainbow, when that isn't even a sexual identity, and I guarantee you there's fewer people who experience discrimination for "not wanting to settle down with someone" than there are than people who are straight or superstraight.

15
mintscape 15 points ago +15 / -0

You are fucking brilliant, it's like you have a gender studies degree but are using it for good and not evil.

Forcing the wokesters to be logically consistent is always entertaining because their whole game is to discriminately and marginalize yet wrap it up in a veneer of caring, you strip away that veneer and expose their ugliness.

Really impressed with your skill at doing that.

8
Mintap 8 points ago +8 / -0

That is Trumpism: Caring more by revealing the fake carers as the hypocrite s they are.

4
Comntrinchief 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOL. I first read “aromantic” and assumed it was some made up sexuality having to do with smelling a certain way.