I agree, male surplus is meaningless until a leader appears to utilize it. Tough to accomplish because men are fine jerking off to pornhub drinking beer and complaining and their lives until they die instead of doing anything about it.
A lot of men are like this, but a lot of other men do want families and children, but can't because there's no incentive for either sex to get married. The problems are, as usual, of governmental and ideological origin.
The economic imbalance between the sexes existed to ensure women would be dependent on men so men could have families and pass their genes on. This gave them some reason to participate in society. But with that economic incentive gone, because feminism, evolutionary biology incarnated as female reproductive choice (feminism again) determines who does and who doesn't get married. And guess what? Females are only interested in dominant males and there's only so many to go around, so the fertility rate drops, which is what you see in every Western society currently.
There's no way of overcoming this without some kind of conservative revolution, so it's blaming the victim to say it's the men's fault. It isn't.
Men controlled society and gave women power. Men also have the ability to take control of society back. I blame men only in the sense that men are choosing not to do anything. Wiemar Republic was a joke for men until Hitler decided to do something about it. It's a joke for men now today. Men need to do something about it. Women won't do anything but men should be doing something.
It's sad men no longer act in their best interests and have installed a system of sexual fascism that ignores male reproductive choice. Men absolutely should take back power, but without solid leadership and organized opposition to feminism, TPTB will just continue what they're doing, maybe even tighten the reins of power. I guess that's the problem, the men who want to do something, the disenfranchised beta males, are isolated and disorganized, whereas the alpha males do as they please, just like they've always done.
You replied in 9 minutes, but the video is 17 minutes, so I conclude you didn't watch the video.
The BLM/Antifa riots as well as ISIS are fuelled by involuntarily celibate young males, and it's only going to become worse.
mabye youre used to being the intellectual superior person in your circle.
this is library.
you want debate and opinion so i gave it.
and your first comment was to diminish the debater...
ohkkk
i started to roll my eyes when the charts were labeled about who has dated and who is sexually active
honestly. what does that correlate to anything, factually?
its odd cus most of the data was working projections.. i mean come on...
chyna, india and US are the three largest populations...
we dont have an issue in chyna or india where...
this is where i started to disagree with the vid...
because like i mentioned earlier. thats a male surplus in the two largest populations on earth for nearly a century...
i think a more valid argument could be made if one were to study the phenomenon of birth rates in japan.
heres a simple fun one...
tell me who is uma thurmans billionaire baby daddy
and how many other babies does that dood have to other women in new york...
then come back and tell me 'the rich doods' are not impregnating more women than the other doods...
so much for copium. im all stocked up.
and thats one simple example i found in 5mins online.
one of more favorites is that japanese billionaire that was having surrogate babies with donor mothers in thailand and indonesia... 25 kids was it? LOL
the thesis is: Men have checked out. Theres more porn in existance than any single person could ever consume.
again. see men. porn.
the only thing that is going to get much much worse, is the abject apathy
lastly, i dont support youtube or people that need clicks from youtube.
I didn't watch the video, but there's significant evidence in anthropology, evolutionary biology that large numbers of unattached males means less societal stability.
Islam, historically, solved the problem by having young men go on jihads and capture slave girls for themselves. But that's becoming increasingly difficult these days, so now Islamists strap them with bombs and feed them delusions about 72 heavenly virgins. The European example would be the Vikings. In the Middle Ages, they raided Europe looking for slave girls, among other things.
You are the one who is clearly unfamiliar with Viking history. This is what I found with a one-click Google search:
Slaves—who could also be traded at international markets—may have represented another type of resource for the Vikings, too. Evidence suggests Vikings often targeted women and girls in their raids, suggesting the existence of sexual slavery, as well as intermarriage. There are also indications that Vikings practiced polygamy, which in their highly stratified society would have meant that poorer unmarried men might have had limited access to women, and would have targeted female slaves as concubines (or even wives).
disagree. i came out of a mgtow reverie some time ago
and i can tell you the data i saw from that group said that
men are checked out entirely.
that wedding boutique shops and ring makers and every business
involved in that whole circus was going bankrupt.
men use dating apps to fuck. its that simple.
and now that women know that, they seem to have checked out of that as well.
this data pede is correlating that 'men are competing for younger women'
yeh, for sex on a app... thats about it. and thats where the data dies.
because sex is not making children. its just fucking.
again, the correlating doesnt carry.
i mean, data pede doesnt even touch on the notion that chyna has had a male surplus for nearly a century...
equally i had seen a projection that japan will cease to exist by 2070...
then FURTHER note that every study i had seen lately has shown that
women, for the past ten years, are more miserable than any other female group in history.
while yes hypergamy and all that...
i would really chalk it up to men waking up to not putting up with bullshit.
and then the internet let men sort,compare and discuss said bullshit... for 20 years.
and now here we are...
i would argue that, we have entered an age of intellectualism and communication
that no other humans have ever experienced in history.
and the advancement in technology has allowed men and women to have a lot
of fucking time to think about shit.
and i think, if i may be so bold, it became philosophical in its rhetoric...
I agree, male surplus is meaningless until a leader appears to utilize it. Tough to accomplish because men are fine jerking off to pornhub drinking beer and complaining and their lives until they die instead of doing anything about it.
this pede sums it up nice and tidy
A lot of men are like this, but a lot of other men do want families and children, but can't because there's no incentive for either sex to get married. The problems are, as usual, of governmental and ideological origin.
The economic imbalance between the sexes existed to ensure women would be dependent on men so men could have families and pass their genes on. This gave them some reason to participate in society. But with that economic incentive gone, because feminism, evolutionary biology incarnated as female reproductive choice (feminism again) determines who does and who doesn't get married. And guess what? Females are only interested in dominant males and there's only so many to go around, so the fertility rate drops, which is what you see in every Western society currently.
There's no way of overcoming this without some kind of conservative revolution, so it's blaming the victim to say it's the men's fault. It isn't.
Men controlled society and gave women power. Men also have the ability to take control of society back. I blame men only in the sense that men are choosing not to do anything. Wiemar Republic was a joke for men until Hitler decided to do something about it. It's a joke for men now today. Men need to do something about it. Women won't do anything but men should be doing something.
It's sad men no longer act in their best interests and have installed a system of sexual fascism that ignores male reproductive choice. Men absolutely should take back power, but without solid leadership and organized opposition to feminism, TPTB will just continue what they're doing, maybe even tighten the reins of power. I guess that's the problem, the men who want to do something, the disenfranchised beta males, are isolated and disorganized, whereas the alpha males do as they please, just like they've always done.
You replied in 9 minutes, but the video is 17 minutes, so I conclude you didn't watch the video.
The BLM/Antifa riots as well as ISIS are fuelled by involuntarily celibate young males, and it's only going to become worse.
i scraped the video with "Any Video Download Pro"
and then skipped to see if there were any graphs with chyna or india in it...
https://i.maga.host/5UIFtB5.png
mabye youre used to being the intellectual superior person in your circle.
you want debate and opinion so i gave it.
and your first comment was to diminish the debater...
ohkkk
i started to roll my eyes when the charts were labeled about who has dated and who is sexually active
honestly. what does that correlate to anything, factually?
its odd cus most of the data was working projections.. i mean come on...
chyna, india and US are the three largest populations...
this is where i started to disagree with the vid...
because like i mentioned earlier. thats a male surplus in the two largest populations on earth for nearly a century...
i think a more valid argument could be made if one were to study the phenomenon of birth rates in japan.
heres a simple fun one...
tell me who is uma thurmans billionaire baby daddy
and how many other babies does that dood have to other women in new york...
then come back and tell me 'the rich doods' are not impregnating more women than the other doods...
so much for copium. im all stocked up.
and thats one simple example i found in 5mins online.
one of more favorites is that japanese billionaire that was having surrogate babies with donor mothers in thailand and indonesia... 25 kids was it? LOL
the thesis is: Men have checked out. Theres more porn in existance than any single person could ever consume.
again. see men. porn.
the only thing that is going to get much much worse, is the abject apathy
lastly, i dont support youtube or people that need clicks from youtube.
hence the use of Any Video Downloader Pro.
Hahahaha! Well done.
I didn't watch the video, but there's significant evidence in anthropology, evolutionary biology that large numbers of unattached males means less societal stability.
Islam, historically, solved the problem by having young men go on jihads and capture slave girls for themselves. But that's becoming increasingly difficult these days, so now Islamists strap them with bombs and feed them delusions about 72 heavenly virgins. The European example would be the Vikings. In the Middle Ages, they raided Europe looking for slave girls, among other things.
You are the one who is clearly unfamiliar with Viking history. This is what I found with a one-click Google search:
https://www.history.com/news/viking-slavery-raids-evidence