2566
Comments (129)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
RiverFenix 9 points ago +10 / -1

"they save more lives than they take" is a completely bogus data point.

The real question is whether they take more lives than otherwise would have been taken by the virus in the first place.

If Covid is 99.98% survivable, and the vaccine is 99.95% effective/safe then your odds are better if you don't take a man-made vaccine and just deal with the man-made virus.

If man is fucking up the globe why do these same retards trust man to deliver a working vaccine for a man-made virus..

-3
PepeTrump2024 -3 points ago +2 / -5

Covid is 98% survivable and the vaccine is 99.999% survivable (based on 966 people dying within 50 days of being vaccinated and us administering 90 million doses).

I'm not thrilled with the vaccine, and I will quite likely survive both, but I'm 100% taking my chances with the vaccine over the virus.

3
RiverFenix 3 points ago +3 / -0

966 so far!

1
CarbonMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many more people die due to lockdowns than vaccines, there is also the statistical possibility that these people would have died anyway, these 966 death are not necessarily caused by the vaccine either they only happened to die within 50 days of taking the vaccine. It could be natural causes, it is a matter of the law of large numbers, not individual cases. Comparing the expected number of people to die with the actual number is what is really actually interesting.