38 Courts Repeatedly Refused To Consider Trump’s Election Claims On The Merits. The losing side needed to know that a fair shake was given, and that justice prevailed, even if it wasn't the outcome they wanted. That did not happen after Nov. 3. (thefederalist.com) posted 35 days ago by Sea_Still 35 days ago by Sea_Still +38 / -0 5 comments share 5 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (5) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 3 ▼ – tyuah8 3 points 35 days ago +3 / -0 You will probably have better luck with the lower courts than the upper courts, as some of the lower courts seem more reasonable. The following are some examples: Michigan judge ordered release of Antrim county forensics report. Arizona judge stated senate can access ballots for auditing. Georgia judge ordered Dominion documents to be made accessible. There could be more that I missed, but I think focusing on the lower courts will likely yield much better results. permalink save report block reply
You will probably have better luck with the lower courts than the upper courts, as some of the lower courts seem more reasonable.
The following are some examples:
There could be more that I missed, but I think focusing on the lower courts will likely yield much better results.