3075
Comments (620)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

A platform is not defined by the people who use it, unless the people who use it are explicitly determined by the people who created and/or maintain it. Reddit can "claim" whatever they like, but the fact is they ban conservatives or anyone espousing conservative thought, hence nearly all the subreddits being filled with leftists because anyone else gets banned. Gab says they want free speech - and they allow free speech.

If they started banning some people for purely ideological reasons, but allowed the anti-semitic posters to stay, then you would have a point.

1
orangemangood2 1 point ago +1 / -0

A platform absolutely is defined by the people who use it. Reddit was a leftist shithole before it started mass banning conservative subreddits.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now explain how that was the result of the platform's policies or framework. What made it a 'leftist platform' before they started imposing arbitrary restrictions and bans on forums like T_D. Because there were a lot of people who weren't leftists that used it, and for the most part didn't have to interact with anyone who was a leftist.

1
orangemangood2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a leftist platform because you could go on a subreddit like r/pics and it would be a Marxist sub with extra steps. This was far before the arbitrary restrictions and banning of conservative subs.

1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again how was that reddit's fault and not just a gathering of Marxists on the internet? Youtube is obviously a leftist platform but you wouldn't know it by looking at the comments on most videos. Nobody likes Xiden and that's reflected in his ratios but just because everyone who goes there hates him doesn't make the platform itself anti-establishment.