They don't look at TV at all, and will only eat home cooked food. No Micky D. Wearing conservative clothes. Modest clothes. With defined sex roles and defined sex rituals.
They are unconquerable.
They have lots of kids. They have unity. They have focus. They don't care what anybody thinks of them. They already have their own moral capital and don't need anybody else's.
They are STRONG. You are disunified and sterile. They are unified, positive, mutually supportive, and have a demographic, and cultural, future. They think about their beliefs, on a schedule, and strongly believe them.
They also do not use drugs, or alcohol to excess, or spend money on tattoos or vacations.
All you have on them is guns. Yes, that's a lot.
Maybe teach other.
But long term, they win, because... they have the children. To get children, you need marriages. To get marriages, you need sexual rules. And sexual scarcity. And defined sex roles. But everybody has to wear a yoke, including you.
The American flag has three colors: red for courage, blue for integrity, and white for purity, meaning sexual chastity.
Tell your woman to cover up. Melania should be your guide.
"I can get a nice date anytime I want," is not a recipe for survival.
https://www.city-journal.org/the-miseducation-of-americas-elites
The Amish
OK.
They have success, yes. I wasn't thinking about them. More about the Duggars and people like them, or the Hassidic or Modern Orthodox Jews. I know more about that. Those people certainly use electricity. Just not on Saturday.
There is a common ground of following the Ten Commandments, including marrying and having children, and having your sex life inside marriage.
Free love killed you, it seems. Sex is NOT "a harmless natural pleasure." It seems to be the engine of surviving or not surviving, and there is nothing harmless about that.
And yes mores, customs, and CLOTHES and cooking, have a lot to do with that.
You are not going to get women trusting men with a brood of children, if the neighbor lady is walking around in skimpy clothing, and HER figure is still trim. SHE didn't bother with children, and now the honest woman who sacrificed her figure has lost her husband. You can't have marriages and kids and universal nudity all together. Pick one. You have. You liked the nudity. And now you are on your way out. Terrible.
You complain. But this is on you.
Guess what Porn in Block In Israel ... don't wanna corrupt their people but they created & run the Porn Industry , kinda make ya go hmmmmm
I think having kids is good and I surely am not participating in this current trash culture of Hollywood pedos, Zuckerberg cuck outs and all, but Amish I'm not and never going to be. Not that I have anything against them. Long live the Amish. But it's not me and I don't need to see women walking around in burkas. I'm not only not Amish, I'm not Islamic either. I'm MAGA. And Melania is not always dressed like a nun either.
Melania dresses like a proper wife.
There are indeed some earlier pictures of her in low necklines. That was in the evening at very formal occasions.
She does NOT walk around like that in the daytime.
Melania shows her whole arm, but wears a dress or skirt most of the time, and rarely shows a knee. And no cleavage. Not these days.
Her heels are too high for non-celebrity women, but there are other shoes that are comfortable and look good.
So yes, just have your woman follow Melania. Nothing Amish about Melania.
I think you spend too much time microanalyzing women's attire. I mean, when we get to the point of someone dictating someone else's heel height, I'm not onboard.
Oh I was just saying her quite high heels were not comfortable or practical for many women. I certainly don't care how high anybody's heels are.
Yes, I do think modest - but nice looking - attire is an essential part of the strength of marriages in general. It is hard to deny that strong marriage is essential to community survival.
So, did Courreges kill your birthrate, when he shortened skirts and showed knees? Yes. He did. He was a talented designer, and he didn't mean any harm, but that was the unintended effect, years later.
Now you have women showing their butt cracks in yoga pants, and that is about the last frontier.
Women should certainly look very nice, but attractive but not erotic or seductive. Like a cool-looking lady.
You won't get women acting right if they can be upstaged by every woman around who shows a little more, or is a few years younger.
At that rate, no woman is going to have so many kids she can't work, because she can be abandoned for anybody. Her husband's head is endlessly turned. She is in Slut World. A dangerous place. She is wary and won't commit.
And she actually fights for the right to compete, because the alternative is to be left behind.
This endless anxiety isn't fun for her, and makes a bad attitude. Then her husband wonders why she is crabby. She is crabby because, being human, he couldn't help glancing around at Bouncing Betty, who just went by in a tank top.
There is medium ground between showing too much, and creeping around completely invisible. The religious people have figured it out where this mid-point is. Their women look very nice, and are also in long term marriages.
They look like ladies.
But the men have to decide what kind of world they want. It is not up to the women. If the men want Butt Crack World, the women are forced to meet that standard or be ignored. And women do not want to be, and cannot afford to be, and are not progarmmed by nature, to be, ignored.
So yes. It matters very much what women wear, in great detail. It does.