Don’t put those freaks on women in general. There are plenty of great female scientist including the chick who photographed a black hole that don’t give a shit about gender and focus on the science.
It’s like when nasa just keeps saying we have women astronauts, instead of ‘damn check out the resumes of our astronaut’.
Nobody discovered anything, she got the credit because she did the most contribution to the code that photographed the actual black hole. Nobody gives a shit if you're a chick, that doesn't give you fuck anything in the regards of what someone with an actual brain did. Hopefully you're pretty, because you seem like a jaded moron.
That girl didn’t contribute the most code to that project by the way. It was another boy in that group who wrote almost the entirety of the code, the girl just happened to also be in the group with that young man and he let her take the credit. It was a pretty big stink at the time. Not insinuating there are no great female scientists, just that specific example you cited may have not been the best example.
I would encourage you to be informed before making claims. Katie Bouman performed a tiny fraction of the work compared to her male counterparts, and even said so at the time. She was not the one making it into some huge women in STEM deal.
You are talking about the corruption of Academia. Not science or academics themselves. Science is the process of coming up with a hypothesis and exploring the wonders of nature to test it. Academics are the organization and formal study of such findings and other arts, historic records.
Progressives (e.g., Democrats) reject those concepts and instead favor power and corruption.
This is what I call the "science industrial complex." Wherein politics drives scientific results, which drives funding, which drives more scientific results favorable to politics, which in turn drives more funding.
Need proof? Global warming. Population explosion. Peak oil. Covid. Monetary theory and banking. Pharmacology.
Clearly Elizabeth never took an English class in her life. ‘He’ is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun when addressing an unknown third party of whom the gender is unknown.
Lets go back to the time when women only made sandwiches. And if anyone retorts about how “x woman had this achievement”, I guarantee there’s at least twenty other men who could have achieved the same thing
Don’t put those freaks on women in general. There are plenty of great female scientist including the chick who photographed a black hole that don’t give a shit about gender and focus on the science.
It’s like when nasa just keeps saying we have women astronauts, instead of ‘damn check out the resumes of our astronaut’.
That chick didn’t discover it. She just got the credit bc that’s what was cool at the time.
Signed, a chick
Nobody discovered anything, she got the credit because she did the most contribution to the code that photographed the actual black hole. Nobody gives a shit if you're a chick, that doesn't give you fuck anything in the regards of what someone with an actual brain did. Hopefully you're pretty, because you seem like a jaded moron.
not triggered
Yeah says the dipshit that tried to use 'mah gender' as proof of anything.
That girl didn’t contribute the most code to that project by the way. It was another boy in that group who wrote almost the entirety of the code, the girl just happened to also be in the group with that young man and he let her take the credit. It was a pretty big stink at the time. Not insinuating there are no great female scientists, just that specific example you cited may have not been the best example.
I would encourage you to be informed before making claims. Katie Bouman performed a tiny fraction of the work compared to her male counterparts, and even said so at the time. She was not the one making it into some huge women in STEM deal.
The chick that "wrote the code" wrote roughly 50,000 lines.
The lead programmer on the project, a dude, wrote 650,000.
Define "most contribution"
The person that the 200+ team of scientists, astrologists and coders that actually did the work say deserve it.
It's funny, the astronauts themselves, that I've seen, do NOT ham it up like that. They are pros, and they don't care about the identity politics.
I mean, not all. Check out Lisa Nowak.
100% of the crimes committed in outer space were committed by lesbians.
Holy fucking shit
Last years are about to make me lose all respect for academia, which I always held in high regard
Science is AWESOME. Academics are AWESOME. Academia is SATANIC.
Couldn't put it better myself
Well, besides satanic. Since I'm no religious folk, I'll just call it "evil". Maybe it's the same shit anyway.
That's the point. There is a religiousness about the way Academia operates.
You are talking about the corruption of Academia. Not science or academics themselves. Science is the process of coming up with a hypothesis and exploring the wonders of nature to test it. Academics are the organization and formal study of such findings and other arts, historic records.
Progressives (e.g., Democrats) reject those concepts and instead favor power and corruption.
Academia is the birthplace of leftist woketards
Nursing took a nose dive. I know plenty of good nurses but man on man those tik tok videos were tasteless
FELLOW BASED WOMEN IN STEM WHERE YA AT
We are here. Just choose to not comment on such stupidity.
My wife? At home, raising children.
This dude is a cunt
Why do they always look exactly how you expect them to look.
This is what I call the "science industrial complex." Wherein politics drives scientific results, which drives funding, which drives more scientific results favorable to politics, which in turn drives more funding.
Need proof? Global warming. Population explosion. Peak oil. Covid. Monetary theory and banking. Pharmacology.
It's a feedback loop.
No, that's what leftists in STEM looks like
Not all women do this but basically all the people who do this are women.
Worthless piece of trash
Clearly Elizabeth never took an English class in her life. ‘He’ is an acceptable gender neutral pronoun when addressing an unknown third party of whom the gender is unknown.
Aaaaannndd that's why the scientific community is regarded as a joke to anyone with a couple of braincells now.
I'm assuming it would probably even prove the basis of the thesis.
Lets go back to the time when women only made sandwiches. And if anyone retorts about how “x woman had this achievement”, I guarantee there’s at least twenty other men who could have achieved the same thing
*who did and didn’t get credit. Fixed that for you.
You don't use pronouns like "he" and "she" in formal writing I believe.
The scientific community's outed itself to be complete trash in the last few years.
The soft sciences basically aren't science. The rest of it appears bought and paid for.
Why cant I find this tweet?