72
Comments (5)
sorted by:
2
Da11en47 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but who is stopping them from cheating with the actual votes to recall him or not. 50% is needed to give him the boot, then a replacement who gets the most votes is in. Didn't the legislature already say that mail in ballots will be accepted for the recall?

1
Cantshadowbanthemall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet they signature verify every one, and still require masks despite the following from the CDC:

During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. coun- ties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementa- tion of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.

1
pente1776 1 point ago +3 / -2

The dems will cheat, they will need more.

1
Cyber1776 [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, this was their goal to ensure they have enough safty room. Based on the amount of verifications they have received so far, they are already safely within margin.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The petition merely triggers a vote.

What are the chances the vote is legitimate?