Adrenaline is a defense mechanism, it's something that occurs when you're in danger, or when you experience something really quite unexpected. it's also something that changes with the amount of danger present. The more danger possible, the more adrenaline will be released. People that have PTSD, have a lower threshold as to the release of Adrenaline, so it can be trained to have conscious control over it, to an extent, possibly to a large extent. The point of Adrenaline, is to basically increase your reflexes, making your reactionary time faster, kind of like slowing time down, and also to increase your pain threshold. There was no threat to this officer at this time, the Adrenaline he most likely would have experienced when making the arrest, when there was a danger posed, would have depleted by the time he was on his neck, at least 10 minutes after the fact. And again, he was handcuffed, leaning on his neck and back, so you saying you don't know where the next attack is going to come from, is really quite nonsense. That being said, this event was PRE FLOYD, if this happened today, with black bystanders, I would agree that there would be an increased danger posed to the officers... I'm curious, if you take Adrenaline out of your defense, what is your argument exactly, besides blaming the system?
You really believe there was not threat at that point? You honestly really truly believe that or you just saying that to keep this conversation alive? I don't you or your real world experiences but I can tell you first hand when the crowd started to gather like that and the verbal confrontations escalate there is definitely a threat and even if not it can still be perceived as a threat. He could have possibly still been hopped up on adrenaline and coming down after leaving he scene even.
Just so we're clear, your argument is now, that he felt Adrenaline because of the crowd and not Floyd? I'll have to look again, but I don't remember there being that many people there. I won't go in to detail about my relevant with Adrenaline, because it's not relevant, but it's considerably more extensive than what you have stated.
No be clear I am not going to get in a Talmudic debate with you where we agree something yet we go round and round circling behind each other to have a battle of the wits to boost our egos and challenge each others intellect. That is not what I am here for I thought I made it clear and I don't have any other way to state it to make it any more clear. I know what I know about adrenaline been there done that real world experience. No Phd. , scientist , expert lab or textbook is going to deny me my personal experience.
Adrenaline is a defense mechanism, it's something that occurs when you're in danger, or when you experience something really quite unexpected. it's also something that changes with the amount of danger present. The more danger possible, the more adrenaline will be released. People that have PTSD, have a lower threshold as to the release of Adrenaline, so it can be trained to have conscious control over it, to an extent, possibly to a large extent. The point of Adrenaline, is to basically increase your reflexes, making your reactionary time faster, kind of like slowing time down, and also to increase your pain threshold. There was no threat to this officer at this time, the Adrenaline he most likely would have experienced when making the arrest, when there was a danger posed, would have depleted by the time he was on his neck, at least 10 minutes after the fact. And again, he was handcuffed, leaning on his neck and back, so you saying you don't know where the next attack is going to come from, is really quite nonsense. That being said, this event was PRE FLOYD, if this happened today, with black bystanders, I would agree that there would be an increased danger posed to the officers... I'm curious, if you take Adrenaline out of your defense, what is your argument exactly, besides blaming the system?
You really believe there was not threat at that point? You honestly really truly believe that or you just saying that to keep this conversation alive? I don't you or your real world experiences but I can tell you first hand when the crowd started to gather like that and the verbal confrontations escalate there is definitely a threat and even if not it can still be perceived as a threat. He could have possibly still been hopped up on adrenaline and coming down after leaving he scene even.
Just so we're clear, your argument is now, that he felt Adrenaline because of the crowd and not Floyd? I'll have to look again, but I don't remember there being that many people there. I won't go in to detail about my relevant with Adrenaline, because it's not relevant, but it's considerably more extensive than what you have stated.
No be clear I am not going to get in a Talmudic debate with you where we agree something yet we go round and round circling behind each other to have a battle of the wits to boost our egos and challenge each others intellect. That is not what I am here for I thought I made it clear and I don't have any other way to state it to make it any more clear. I know what I know about adrenaline been there done that real world experience. No Phd. , scientist , expert lab or textbook is going to deny me my personal experience.
No, you've changed your argument...You lose!
It was a simple question, have you been in that position?
Answer me this, have you honestly ever been in a combat situation? Have you been in a situation where even the perceived threat is life or death?
Yes...