3460
Comments (150)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
comakevin76 21 points ago +21 / -0

I have no issue with that. You attack my car with my family inside you go bye-bye. Me alone, I just get out and go boom. I take care of my own.

3
independentbystander 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. I'll be judged by 12 before I'll be carried away by 6.

I would be much more concerned with the ill effect on my car/tires than the chosen fate of an illiterate jogger/narcissistic SJW who decides to FAFO on the wrong day (for them.) I am useful to society, they are not. They choose their fate when they attack innocents. If they put themselves in the position of finally getting what they deserve, then it's about time.

>Worthless joggers are worthless.

3
comakevin76 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like the way you think. Maybe it was a blind spot by the sun or something. One never knows. If I am on the jury I will say not guilty your honor. But that's me.

2
independentbystander 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you <3 <3 <3

I'm quite serious, I am useful to society (well-known in my community as a helpful law-abiding citizen/no arrest record/stupid level of charity-work.) I have done (and still do) A Lot of volunteer work over the years teaching pre-schoolers to read: in general I am aggressive about getting little kids interested in learning, not necessarily school per se. (Although I do stress rules/manners etc not just for school but for their future.) I've done this sort of work officially, but at present when I see a pre-schooler among my friends who isn't getting effective reading training from their parents I make a point to give long-term help (with their permission/supervision, obviously.) My point being even though I don't have kids, I do what I can to help my friends/families'/sometimes strangers' kids turn out to be smart productive members of society. It's an investment in the future that the typical jogger can't comprehend: by doing these favors for others, I'm improving my own environment.

My wife is also useful to society, her work benefits many people in distress per day and she is well-liked by her company. She isn't out for attention nor applause, but she really is good at handling frustrating situations of helping these people with their self-inflicted problems. I couldn't do it, certainly not every day for decades until retirement. She is also an inherently kind person, a rare case of an exceptionally pretty girl who avoids the high-maintenence narcissism that typically characterizes today's females-above-a-"3" who feel their (dubious) looks/gender give them the excuse to make unreasonable demands/inflict psychological torture.

It's not even my own self-preservation instinct that puts roadblocking joggers/SJWs on the path to obsolescence. If I were to be attacked/robbed/wounded/killed by miscreants, my wife would be distressed and I have zero tolerance for that. I will not hesitate to protect myself against these tantrum-headed mindless assholes, be that by Constitutional Right or by Bloody Burnout. This concept is way over their heads but: They have no idea the lengths I will go to to keep my wife from having a bad day.

>More importantly: None of the movies these joggers/SJWs received their bad behavior from can prepare them for what would happen to anyone who dared to threaten my wife or family the way these rioters are doing to people so often, trying to beat their way into random cars. That would result in Scorched Earth, with the added benefit of a few less problem-causers for the future.

>tl;dr If self-defense involves a flattened jogger or some tire-marks on a flabby SJW, I consider that a small price to pay for a more peaceful society.