This is how you end up like Venezuela. Morons like her are incapable of understanding cascading effects. And she is a prime example of why I generally want females completely out of government. They are very frequently the source of natural law illiteracy, economic illiteracy, general idiocy, emotional noise distractions and major dysfunction.
You think the commie doesn’t understand her commie proposal? She presents it as social justice to the masses, but we all know it’s another tactic to wipe out the middle class.
"In order to oust the kulaks as a class, the resistance of this class must be smashed in open battle and it must be deprived of the productive sources of its existence and development (free use of land, instruments of production, land-renting, right to hire labour, etc.)" - Joseph Stalin
Thank you! I keep repeating this for everyone to finally understand, they want COMMUNISM in the US. Just because they call it social justice does not mean the result on the ground is the exact same.
Well, it's more about wiping out economic classes, and providing nice things based on how politically connected they are. Or at least making it so that their loyal political supporters don't starve and fuck everyone else.
In Venezuela, the politically connected people don't know any wants. But god damn if you are anyone else.
I agree. We need to get most women out of our government. Really, we need to get most women out of positions of power at large.
Need a moratorium on the 19th Amendment too. The vast majority of the problems we are facing in Western Nations currently are because we have allowed too many women into positions of power for 50-60 years.
It’s what killed Rome, and Greece, way back in the day. Most are just not suited for it. You cannot nurture everyone and everything. You can’t always default to compassion. You have to be accountable, reasonable, and strong enough to make a tough decision, in some cases. Most women struggle with all of these things.
That’s not to say there aren’t good ones who have had positions of power, and will. They’re just exceedingly rare.
It's also why single mothers are generally awful at it. They lack the ability to be consistent and default to their biological imperatives, as you said.
It’s not just that. When a woman has to fulfill both roles of being the provider, and being the nurturer, it overwhelms them. Turns them back to their biological imperatives sometimes, but other times it causes them to neglect the needs of their children.
I would never envy the children of some, feminist, single mother. Especially if the kids were boys.
That’s not to say that children who grow up in single mother households are always going to have a hellish upbringing, but like finding a great female leader... it’s rare.
My wife is based because her father raised her right.
They are more disposed to be nurturing of course, but that's a primal instinct that can be controlled just like men control many primal instincts as well.
The constitution was not intended for a population that can't take care of themselves. In fact, it was explicitly written for people WANTED to be free to do so.
The problem is we imported a massive population of people who abhor the idea of responsibility. These are people who fail in their home country and run to America in hopes of being able to fail and still survive here.
Omar is one of this population and she speaks for them. They don't WANT America, the land of the free, they want America the land where you take care of me in return for my freedom.
When you only praise rich people in hugeass million dollar mansions who live the life of owning unicorns that shit money this is what you get: The much larger population that do not have unicorns with money shitting out their asses will want to be able to live 1% of that extravagant spending lifestyle
SPEZ: all you downvoters know it's true. Huge ass wealth gap between social classes like what is happening now always leads to bad things for the people at the top with unicorns that poop out $$$ like France, Russia, and China. It is why 98% of big companies are shitting themselves and trying to placate the bottom social class with bullshit like critical race theory and kneeling for trannies and BLM. Bandaid on a cracking dam is all it is.
So I want to respond to you, from an economics and demographics perspective.
Wealth Inequity or the fact that people acquire different states of wealth has more factors to it, other than rich stay rich and poor stay poor. Some quick statistics is that only 50% of people in poverty stay in poverty the next year and 15% of the US population will be in the top 1%. One of the most important factors is Age and Wealth Inequity is increasing as Boomers prepare to leave the work force and will start moving the opposite direction as they all retire bringing other problems.
Boomers have been the beneficiaries of some of the most ideal economic times in history for their age group due to a paradigm shift from a demand for physical labor to mental labor. When Boomers were young, their skill sets regarding physical first jobs were in high demand as the previous generations had less supply. Furthermore, as other technology changes such as a move to offices and automation began, boomers who were encouraged to be educated to counter the Soviet Union took over and were economically good. And if they were a savvy investor, they have been enjoying the monetary glut for the past years. Effectively, there were good
economic times for the boomers entire life and as they were in the workforce wealth inequality increased. This is similar to what happened statistically pre-great depression, as credit expansion in the economy ultimately leads into an alternative credit contraction, the bigger the boom, the bigger the bust and everyone loses as the unnatural credit is reigned in by failure, but the government says it can’t fail, so big institutes have just pumped out mo’ money and expanded credit further.
By natural economic forces alone: the house of cards will come crashing down, but it will be the poor who suffers the most. Most landlords are not the super rich: they usually are people who as an investment bought property from the banks using a mortgage and levering the credit expansion. The contraction is going to hurt them further: laws like these only make the problem worse. Pain has to come: it has been reckoned, but it will reach the top, that I can guarantee.
From a statistics perspective, I don’t use statistics as core to my argument.
What I mean to say is that an economical exchange only occurs when someone says that they prefer the other thing more than the dollars they have. That is how all value is created: I think a burger is worth more than my $5 bucks and you think the burger is only worth $3 bucks to produce, therefore you pocket a $2 difference and we conduct the exchange and we are both left happier.
If you have more money, you can invest in employees, who consider there time worth a certain amount of money and they won’t work for less and actively desire more and you consider what they do as your firm more productive in terms of making money than the cost to hire them. You conduct that exchange, it is for willing participants.
Same thing happens with rent, you consider being sheltered worth more than the money you have to pay each month and the landlord considers the money you pay each month more valuable than living their themselves or selling the property.
Now imagine if the government interferes with this: now you can’t collect rent and you are forced into a transaction where you can’t live in your own property yourself and you can only sell the property at a loss because it has renters in it that you can’t kick out. You are also still liable for upkeep by the government and the government isn’t offsetting your costs. What do you do? Well you sell at a loss to some bank and rent across the board goes up, why? Because people need to reclaim costs from those that aren’t paying. Rent going up, encourages more people not to pay, which force rent higher and higher for everyone who is paying and eventually everyone refuses to rent. That is the consequence of these laws.
A big part of it is Celebrity Worship Syndrom. A HUGE part of the population is so engrossed in the supposed minute details of celebrity lives and the lifestyles they live, they are jealous and want that lifestyle as well. Parties, drugs, fast cars, expensive clothes and jewelry, etc. They assume all CEOs and such live the same lifestyle. Some do, some dont.
I went from making minimum wage cutting grass to making something of myself even through a divorce and child support payments.
What is your excuse for never doing anything with your life?
People who create their own company are the ones who CREATE a job for you to get.. and you shit on them because you have no ambition or understanding of the hard work that goes into Making something out of nothing.
He isn't speaking about logic or reality. None of that matters to NPC normies. If you actually stop to think about it logic always sides with capitalism despite its few shortcomings because the alternative is always worse. The problem is that the NPC does not think and humanity is mired in jealousy.
You are correct. Perhaps this explains why and how Western Civilization was able to succeed when all others repeatedly failed. We temporarily halted this process with Christianity. Now that the Church has basically fallen, and Christian culture is almost dead we are now rapidly accelerating towards the overdue end point of the cycle.
This is how you end up like Venezuela. Morons like her are incapable of understanding cascading effects. And she is a prime example of why I generally want females completely out of government. They are very frequently the source of natural law illiteracy, economic illiteracy, general idiocy, emotional noise distractions and major dysfunction.
Sorry, not sorry.
You think the commie doesn’t understand her commie proposal? She presents it as social justice to the masses, but we all know it’s another tactic to wipe out the middle class.
Yes, this is a full blown commie tactic. Classic example
"In order to oust the kulaks as a class, the resistance of this class must be smashed in open battle and it must be deprived of the productive sources of its existence and development (free use of land, instruments of production, land-renting, right to hire labour, etc.)" - Joseph Stalin
Thank you! I keep repeating this for everyone to finally understand, they want COMMUNISM in the US. Just because they call it social justice does not mean the result on the ground is the exact same.
Well, it's more about wiping out economic classes, and providing nice things based on how politically connected they are. Or at least making it so that their loyal political supporters don't starve and fuck everyone else.
In Venezuela, the politically connected people don't know any wants. But god damn if you are anyone else.
You just described communism.
I agree. We need to get most women out of our government. Really, we need to get most women out of positions of power at large.
Need a moratorium on the 19th Amendment too. The vast majority of the problems we are facing in Western Nations currently are because we have allowed too many women into positions of power for 50-60 years.
It’s what killed Rome, and Greece, way back in the day. Most are just not suited for it. You cannot nurture everyone and everything. You can’t always default to compassion. You have to be accountable, reasonable, and strong enough to make a tough decision, in some cases. Most women struggle with all of these things.
That’s not to say there aren’t good ones who have had positions of power, and will. They’re just exceedingly rare.
I’m not sorry either.
God thank you for putting into such simple terms the problem with female thinking in government!
It's also why single mothers are generally awful at it. They lack the ability to be consistent and default to their biological imperatives, as you said.
It’s not just that. When a woman has to fulfill both roles of being the provider, and being the nurturer, it overwhelms them. Turns them back to their biological imperatives sometimes, but other times it causes them to neglect the needs of their children.
I would never envy the children of some, feminist, single mother. Especially if the kids were boys.
That’s not to say that children who grow up in single mother households are always going to have a hellish upbringing, but like finding a great female leader... it’s rare.
Maybe educate your women better.
My wife is based because her father raised her right.
They are more disposed to be nurturing of course, but that's a primal instinct that can be controlled just like men control many primal instincts as well.
All boils down to emotional intelligence.
I mean, you’re not wrong. That’s why I was careful to say most. Not all.
The constitution was not intended for a population that can't take care of themselves. In fact, it was explicitly written for people WANTED to be free to do so.
The problem is we imported a massive population of people who abhor the idea of responsibility. These are people who fail in their home country and run to America in hopes of being able to fail and still survive here.
Omar is one of this population and she speaks for them. They don't WANT America, the land of the free, they want America the land where you take care of me in return for my freedom.
That kind of bullshit never works out.
But all we have to do is make everything free and then utopia magically manifests!
When you only praise rich people in hugeass million dollar mansions who live the life of owning unicorns that shit money this is what you get: The much larger population that do not have unicorns with money shitting out their asses will want to be able to live 1% of that extravagant spending lifestyle
SPEZ: all you downvoters know it's true. Huge ass wealth gap between social classes like what is happening now always leads to bad things for the people at the top with unicorns that poop out $$$ like France, Russia, and China. It is why 98% of big companies are shitting themselves and trying to placate the bottom social class with bullshit like critical race theory and kneeling for trannies and BLM. Bandaid on a cracking dam is all it is.
What’s your fixation with unicorns? Instead of sounding wise you sound like a brony.
So I want to respond to you, from an economics and demographics perspective.
Wealth Inequity or the fact that people acquire different states of wealth has more factors to it, other than rich stay rich and poor stay poor. Some quick statistics is that only 50% of people in poverty stay in poverty the next year and 15% of the US population will be in the top 1%. One of the most important factors is Age and Wealth Inequity is increasing as Boomers prepare to leave the work force and will start moving the opposite direction as they all retire bringing other problems.
Boomers have been the beneficiaries of some of the most ideal economic times in history for their age group due to a paradigm shift from a demand for physical labor to mental labor. When Boomers were young, their skill sets regarding physical first jobs were in high demand as the previous generations had less supply. Furthermore, as other technology changes such as a move to offices and automation began, boomers who were encouraged to be educated to counter the Soviet Union took over and were economically good. And if they were a savvy investor, they have been enjoying the monetary glut for the past years. Effectively, there were good economic times for the boomers entire life and as they were in the workforce wealth inequality increased. This is similar to what happened statistically pre-great depression, as credit expansion in the economy ultimately leads into an alternative credit contraction, the bigger the boom, the bigger the bust and everyone loses as the unnatural credit is reigned in by failure, but the government says it can’t fail, so big institutes have just pumped out mo’ money and expanded credit further.
By natural economic forces alone: the house of cards will come crashing down, but it will be the poor who suffers the most. Most landlords are not the super rich: they usually are people who as an investment bought property from the banks using a mortgage and levering the credit expansion. The contraction is going to hurt them further: laws like these only make the problem worse. Pain has to come: it has been reckoned, but it will reach the top, that I can guarantee.
Proceeds to ramble about feelings and cherry picked stats instead of economics
From a statistics perspective, I don’t use statistics as core to my argument.
What I mean to say is that an economical exchange only occurs when someone says that they prefer the other thing more than the dollars they have. That is how all value is created: I think a burger is worth more than my $5 bucks and you think the burger is only worth $3 bucks to produce, therefore you pocket a $2 difference and we conduct the exchange and we are both left happier.
If you have more money, you can invest in employees, who consider there time worth a certain amount of money and they won’t work for less and actively desire more and you consider what they do as your firm more productive in terms of making money than the cost to hire them. You conduct that exchange, it is for willing participants.
Same thing happens with rent, you consider being sheltered worth more than the money you have to pay each month and the landlord considers the money you pay each month more valuable than living their themselves or selling the property.
Now imagine if the government interferes with this: now you can’t collect rent and you are forced into a transaction where you can’t live in your own property yourself and you can only sell the property at a loss because it has renters in it that you can’t kick out. You are also still liable for upkeep by the government and the government isn’t offsetting your costs. What do you do? Well you sell at a loss to some bank and rent across the board goes up, why? Because people need to reclaim costs from those that aren’t paying. Rent going up, encourages more people not to pay, which force rent higher and higher for everyone who is paying and eventually everyone refuses to rent. That is the consequence of these laws.
So you should be fine if your mortgage is paid off and you can afford to pay the property taxes..
when do you stop paying tho - when inflation starts going into hyperinflation? Save your monies for a time when things level out?
When HyperInflation starts, it is a race for real assets.
A big part of it is Celebrity Worship Syndrom. A HUGE part of the population is so engrossed in the supposed minute details of celebrity lives and the lifestyles they live, they are jealous and want that lifestyle as well. Parties, drugs, fast cars, expensive clothes and jewelry, etc. They assume all CEOs and such live the same lifestyle. Some do, some dont.
I went from making minimum wage cutting grass to making something of myself even through a divorce and child support payments.
What is your excuse for never doing anything with your life?
People who create their own company are the ones who CREATE a job for you to get.. and you shit on them because you have no ambition or understanding of the hard work that goes into Making something out of nothing.
He isn't speaking about logic or reality. None of that matters to NPC normies. If you actually stop to think about it logic always sides with capitalism despite its few shortcomings because the alternative is always worse. The problem is that the NPC does not think and humanity is mired in jealousy.
You are correct. Perhaps this explains why and how Western Civilization was able to succeed when all others repeatedly failed. We temporarily halted this process with Christianity. Now that the Church has basically fallen, and Christian culture is almost dead we are now rapidly accelerating towards the overdue end point of the cycle.