3145 Here we go: “Assault” Weapon Ban introduced in Senate (www.breitbart.com) posted 34 days ago by TexasPiper 34 days ago by TexasPiper +3145 / -0 708 comments share 708 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (708) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 30 ▼ – EricCharliemella 30 points 34 days ago +30 / -0 Look at the header of the bill, that could be taken in a much more sinister way... "To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes." You mean other purposes because you have plans we would shoot you for? permalink save report block reply ▲ 21 ▼ – Skippious 21 points 34 days ago +21 / -0 ...to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited... That right there makes it unconstitutional. ...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. To limit is to infringe. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 10 ▼ – paradox123 10 points 34 days ago +10 / -0 China's current constitution protects freedom of speech.So did the USSR. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – stealthboy 6 points 34 days ago +6 / -0 shhh... reading is hard. permalink parent save report block reply
Look at the header of the bill, that could be taken in a much more sinister way...
"To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes."
You mean other purposes because you have plans we would shoot you for?
That right there makes it unconstitutional.
To limit is to infringe.
China's current constitution protects freedom of speech.So did the USSR.
shhh... reading is hard.