It is just a really complicated way for people like Chris Wray to say:
"If I agree with it, then it is not terrorism, but if I disagree with it, then it is."
The definition he is using is purely subjective, which is a meaningless definition. A much more meaningful definition would be to check for the presence of large-scale physical violence.
If there is large-scale physical violence, then it is terrorism; otherwise, it is not.
It is just a really complicated way for people like Chris Wray to say:
"If I agree with it, then it is not terrorism, but if I disagree with it, then it is."
The definition he is using is purely subjective, which is a meaningless definition. A much more meaningful definition would be to check for the presence of large-scale physical violence.
If there is large-scale physical violence, then it is terrorism; otherwise, it is not.