Then why have the House or Senate look at the results at all? They're able to challenge them for a reason. Several Senators did challenge them - even knowing it wouldn't change anything, purely to signal whose side they were on. Was Rand one of them?
Did he vote for or against certifying the fraudulent election?
The states did.
Then why have the House or Senate look at the results at all? They're able to challenge them for a reason. Several Senators did challenge them - even knowing it wouldn't change anything, purely to signal whose side they were on. Was Rand one of them?