All vaccines before these recent ones introduced a small amount of a virus to your immune system so that your immune system can easily fight off a virus. When your immune system fights off a virus it creates antibodies. When you have antibodies it is much easier for your immune system to fight off the same virus again. This is the entire reasoning and purpose of a vaccine.
If your "vaccine" does not create antibodies, it's not a vaccine. They can change the definition all they want, it doesn't make it true.
Antibodies are the gold standard. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying to you. This is 5th grade level heath class stuff, incase you forgot.
isn't this one creating antibodies too?
instead of injecting a piece of virus they're hijacking your cells machinery to make a piece. (same thing viruses do, btw)
mRNA "vaccines" are not creating antibodies. If they were, why would anybody be attempting to differentiate between taking the "vaccine" and having antibodies from fighting off the virus. They would both lead to the same result. Antibodies.
I have heard multiple times from doctors on MSM that if you have antibodies from having COVID you still "need the vaccine". That simply isn't logical. The jab isn't creating some magically better antibodies than the antibodies your immune system creates.