Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
CuomoisaMassMurderer 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Trust you"

You started out by saying conversion therapy itself leads to suicide. Instead of substantiating that claim, or addressing what "conversion therapy" he went through and how that might differ from whatever you thought it meant,

you move the goalposts to talk about someone else's motives - which you know nothing about.

You're a liar. Nobody in their right mind would trust you, ever. At least not until you learn how to think straight.

Bronski 0 points ago +1 / -1


"Of course, I was never wholly at home in the gay lifestyle — Who is? Who could be? — and only leaned heavily into it in public because it drove liberals crazy to see a handsome, charismatic, intelligent gay man riotously celebrating conservative principles,” Yiannopoulos continued.

“That’s not to say I didn’t throw myself enthusiastically into degeneracy of all kinds in my private life. I suppose I felt that’s all I deserved. I’d love to say it was all an act, and I’ve been straight this whole time, but even I don’t have that kind of commitment to performance art. Talk about method acting.[i.e. he is not straight]”

CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't even separate out your own thoughts from the quote. Learn how to think straight, kid.

Bronski 0 points ago +1 / -1

Milo is an attention seeker.

Milo wants to "rehabilitate conversion therapy" (his own words).

Milo is not straight and acting gay, "good performance art" (again, his own words).

Milo is not suicidal because he loves the attention and would not get attention to appreciate were he dead.

CuomoisaMassMurderer 0 points ago +0 / -0

Your first two statements are correct.

Your third is baseless. Who are YOU to claim to know if Milo is "super straight," super faggot, or anything else? You can't possibly. I could just as easily claim he was never gay and he's just now growing up a bit to realize that. That could be true? If you're going to speculate be honest about it, it can be interesting discussion. And us talking about it is satisfying to the attention whore.

"Conversion therapy" did some horrible things, but nobody really knows if that was a tiny minority of cases or standard practice. It got politicized, and you're here lying at least as much as any MSM outlet. Shame on you!

"Conversion therapy" could avoid all abuse, be "rehabilitated," and still fail. Or succeed. Who knows? It hasn't been done, documented, and had sufficient light of day shed on it.

Any individual's sexual orientation is known best by them. And I'll stack up my gaydar against anybody's. You get to speak for one person: YOU. Our side is horrible about recognizing this.