No...I just hate what QTARD grifters Sydney and Lin have done.
I don't like Patrick Byrne either, but he was the only other one in the Oval Office for that meeting and offered a different explanation from a different perspective as to why the lawsuits went down as they did.
I'm just offering a different viewpoint that could explain things, that's all.
One state suing another in the context of election fraud makes no sense - Texas did not have any standing to sue Pennsylvania for how they slated their electors. It's a plenary power given to each state. They did not have standing to bring a suit period.
Only party that had standing to bring a suit against Pennsylvania was Donald J. Trump for President Inc. as he was the only one that had incurred damages.
There is legal precedent for this - Bush v. Gore. The two campaigns sued each other. The lawsuit in 2000 was not [Insert State Here] v. Florida, but rather Bush v. Gore as the individual campaigns had the standing to sue. The Texas v. PA lawsuit this time made zero sense.
And what I'm saying is that the lawsuits that were filed by the Trump campaign were severely lacking to the point of seeming like Trump's lawyers were trying to sabotage him.
Its a shame the amount of damage Lin Wood and Powell did. 90% of this site were all screaming "TRUST THE KRAKEN" and all trusting Wood's disinformation about CIA seized servers and gun battles between the military and CIA, or how the military would arrest Biden and all of Congress before the inauguration.
People such as myself who were trying to wake people up from trusting those grifters were shouted down as "doomers" and "shills"
And you still can't criticize them, because people don't want to admit they were wrong.
The guy you are replying to is not even correct. I’ve read Patrick’s blog posts, and he says Sydney is a brilliant lawyer. His main complaint seems to be that Rudy was incompetent, not that he was a grifter, and that Trump relied on him rather than Sydney.
Who knows the truth, but this guy is not even representing what Patrick said correctly.
No...I just hate what QTARD grifters Sydney and Lin have done.
I don't like Patrick Byrne either, but he was the only other one in the Oval Office for that meeting and offered a different explanation from a different perspective as to why the lawsuits went down as they did.
I'm just offering a different viewpoint that could explain things, that's all.
SCROTUS rejected the Texas lawsuit. That had nothing to do with Linn or Sydney did it?
One state suing another in the context of election fraud makes no sense - Texas did not have any standing to sue Pennsylvania for how they slated their electors. It's a plenary power given to each state. They did not have standing to bring a suit period.
Only party that had standing to bring a suit against Pennsylvania was Donald J. Trump for President Inc. as he was the only one that had incurred damages.
There is legal precedent for this - Bush v. Gore. The two campaigns sued each other. The lawsuit in 2000 was not [Insert State Here] v. Florida, but rather Bush v. Gore as the individual campaigns had the standing to sue. The Texas v. PA lawsuit this time made zero sense.
And what I'm saying is that the lawsuits that were filed by the Trump campaign were severely lacking to the point of seeming like Trump's lawyers were trying to sabotage him.
Its a shame the amount of damage Lin Wood and Powell did. 90% of this site were all screaming "TRUST THE KRAKEN" and all trusting Wood's disinformation about CIA seized servers and gun battles between the military and CIA, or how the military would arrest Biden and all of Congress before the inauguration.
People such as myself who were trying to wake people up from trusting those grifters were shouted down as "doomers" and "shills"
And you still can't criticize them, because people don't want to admit they were wrong.
That you know of. Because Byrne told you.
I've yet to hear Trump confirm ANY of it.
Everything you accuse Powell and Wood of, Byrne is just as capable of being guilty of. He's a lawyer. He's a professional liar.
Now, I will admit I stopped paying attention to Wood early on. Something wasn't right with him.
The guy you are replying to is not even correct. I’ve read Patrick’s blog posts, and he says Sydney is a brilliant lawyer. His main complaint seems to be that Rudy was incompetent, not that he was a grifter, and that Trump relied on him rather than Sydney.
Who knows the truth, but this guy is not even representing what Patrick said correctly.