You are comparing apples to oranges. Many states brought election related suits forward. All were denied before facts ever got to be presented. THAT is the only thing that matter, they were dismissed on procedural grounds rather than facts. Each and every judge abdicated their duty. It has NOTHING to do with WHO brought the lawsuits, period.
It absolutely has everything to do with who brought the lawsuits. It's a jurisdictional and standing concern. A suit cannot be heard if either the court [A] doesn't have the jurisdiction to hear it (remember: we don't have federal elections -- we have 50 state elections on the same date.) or [B.] if the party doesn't have any standing to sue.
One state suing another in the context of election fraud makes no sense - Texas did not have any standing to sue Pennsylvania for how they slated their electors. It's a plenary power given to each state. They did not have standing to bring a suit period.
Only party that had standing to bring a suit against Pennsylvania was Donald J. Trump for President Inc. as he was the only one that had incurred damages.
There is legal precedent for this - Bush v. Gore. The two campaigns sued each other. The lawsuit in 2000 was not [Insert State Here] v. Florida, but rather Bush v. Gore as the individual campaigns had the standing to sue. The Texas v. PA lawsuit this time made zero sense.
And what I'm saying is that the lawsuits that were filed by the Trump campaign were severely lacking to the point of seeming like Trump's lawyers were trying to sabotage him.
You are referring to a few of 80+ lawsuits, most of all which were brought by states against their own states, and all which were dismissed before facts could be heard. Did they have misspellings, too? Is that truly a basis for condemnation? Guess you never read real legal briefings, bc they are all laughable.
You argument makes zero sense, but instead tries to place blame on a couple of people who decided to try to go the federal route.
No state anywhere, with a couple minor exceptions, would touch any of this- so it cannot be placed on any single person or persons. Why are you attempting to proved that it is? What is your motive?
Also, if you read my original comment you’ll see that I’m not saying that the courts aren’t corrupt. They absolutely are.
I’m saying that along with some degree of corruption in the courts, that the lawsuits brought by the Trump legal team were an utter joke and his lawyers backstabbed him.
The two aren’t mutually exclusive - the courts can be corrupt and his lawyers can suck at the same time.
You are comparing apples to oranges. Many states brought election related suits forward. All were denied before facts ever got to be presented. THAT is the only thing that matter, they were dismissed on procedural grounds rather than facts. Each and every judge abdicated their duty. It has NOTHING to do with WHO brought the lawsuits, period.
You stated the main reason.
It absolutely has everything to do with who brought the lawsuits. It's a jurisdictional and standing concern. A suit cannot be heard if either the court [A] doesn't have the jurisdiction to hear it (remember: we don't have federal elections -- we have 50 state elections on the same date.) or [B.] if the party doesn't have any standing to sue.
One state suing another in the context of election fraud makes no sense - Texas did not have any standing to sue Pennsylvania for how they slated their electors. It's a plenary power given to each state. They did not have standing to bring a suit period.
Only party that had standing to bring a suit against Pennsylvania was Donald J. Trump for President Inc. as he was the only one that had incurred damages.
There is legal precedent for this - Bush v. Gore. The two campaigns sued each other. The lawsuit in 2000 was not [Insert State Here] v. Florida, but rather Bush v. Gore as the individual campaigns had the standing to sue. The Texas v. PA lawsuit this time made zero sense.
And what I'm saying is that the lawsuits that were filed by the Trump campaign were severely lacking to the point of seeming like Trump's lawyers were trying to sabotage him.
Trump did personally sue Biden. SCOTUS still punted.
I agree with a lot of what you said, especially as it relates to Rudy, but SCOTUS is cucked and refused to uphold their oath. Period.
(Trump v. Biden Case No. 2020AP2038)
You are referring to a few of 80+ lawsuits, most of all which were brought by states against their own states, and all which were dismissed before facts could be heard. Did they have misspellings, too? Is that truly a basis for condemnation? Guess you never read real legal briefings, bc they are all laughable.
You argument makes zero sense, but instead tries to place blame on a couple of people who decided to try to go the federal route.
No state anywhere, with a couple minor exceptions, would touch any of this- so it cannot be placed on any single person or persons. Why are you attempting to proved that it is? What is your motive?
Also, if you read my original comment you’ll see that I’m not saying that the courts aren’t corrupt. They absolutely are.
I’m saying that along with some degree of corruption in the courts, that the lawsuits brought by the Trump legal team were an utter joke and his lawyers backstabbed him.
The two aren’t mutually exclusive - the courts can be corrupt and his lawyers can suck at the same time.
Then why are calling every other attorney bringing about claims about irregularities out
Why just Trump’s?
I swear, it’s almost like you have an agenda