3797
Comments (293)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
DontArkancideMeBro 11 points ago +11 / -0

SCROTUS rejected the Texas lawsuit. That had nothing to do with Linn or Sydney did it?

-2
giantrabbit1 -2 points ago +1 / -3

One state suing another in the context of election fraud makes no sense - Texas did not have any standing to sue Pennsylvania for how they slated their electors. It's a plenary power given to each state. They did not have standing to bring a suit period.

Only party that had standing to bring a suit against Pennsylvania was Donald J. Trump for President Inc. as he was the only one that had incurred damages.

There is legal precedent for this - Bush v. Gore. The two campaigns sued each other. The lawsuit in 2000 was not [Insert State Here] v. Florida, but rather Bush v. Gore as the individual campaigns had the standing to sue. The Texas v. PA lawsuit this time made zero sense.

And what I'm saying is that the lawsuits that were filed by the Trump campaign were severely lacking to the point of seeming like Trump's lawyers were trying to sabotage him.

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a shame the amount of damage Lin Wood and Powell did. 90% of this site were all screaming "TRUST THE KRAKEN" and all trusting Wood's disinformation about CIA seized servers and gun battles between the military and CIA, or how the military would arrest Biden and all of Congress before the inauguration.

People such as myself who were trying to wake people up from trusting those grifters were shouted down as "doomers" and "shills"

And you still can't criticize them, because people don't want to admit they were wrong.