Doubt this one will pass, but even presenting it is an infringement.

Calling our right to bear arms “limited” is not just unconstitutional, but an act of war against the populace. Especially considering it allows for law enforcement to have these exact same weapons.

I find it particularly disturbing things that have no bearing on the power and caliber of a gun, like an adjustable stock or a forward grip, are considered as deal breakers for ownership.

It’s also a clusterfuck of reasoning because many higher powered rifles are seemingly allowed whereas much lower caliber rifles are being hailed as weapons of war because they have protection for your hand over the barrel.

Nope, not gonna comply and nobody will get my property uncontested.