It appears she was going into custody and she forcibly pulled away from the officer and only then decided to start to walk out when she began to realize shit was getting serious. Not how it works.
Not really. She made her point, its not a law and he didnt seem to like that. He could have easily just let her walk out and it would be over with. He didnt need to force her down like he did.
Correct, the mask shit is not a law. That's not the issue. Like it or not (I wouldn't bank with them) that bank enforced a company policy (yes, it's a private business, we're not into full on socialism yet) and she chose to ignore it and cause a disturbance and they wanted her to leave the property. THAT'S what was being enforced. Again, play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Also, are you the ignorant type that watches a police shooting and says, "Why didn't that cop just shoot that axe wielding maniac in the toe." in a lethal force situation? He didn't tackle her like described in the click bait title. He gave her verbal commands that she chose to ignore. He then simply escalated his force to stay just above her escalating force to stay in control of the situation as safely for him AND HER as possible. Fucking damned if you do or don't apparently.
All you are doing is analyzing the situation with your emotions. Use logic and reason instead. Don't be a liberal.
She simply should have abided momentarily, got her money and quit doing business there, and aimed that passion and effort in the right direction to obtain true satisfaction.
I watched it too. She was heading for the door when he grabbed her to arrest her.
It appears she was going into custody and she forcibly pulled away from the officer and only then decided to start to walk out when she began to realize shit was getting serious. Not how it works.
Not really. She made her point, its not a law and he didnt seem to like that. He could have easily just let her walk out and it would be over with. He didnt need to force her down like he did.
Correct, the mask shit is not a law. That's not the issue. Like it or not (I wouldn't bank with them) that bank enforced a company policy (yes, it's a private business, we're not into full on socialism yet) and she chose to ignore it and cause a disturbance and they wanted her to leave the property. THAT'S what was being enforced. Again, play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Also, are you the ignorant type that watches a police shooting and says, "Why didn't that cop just shoot that axe wielding maniac in the toe." in a lethal force situation? He didn't tackle her like described in the click bait title. He gave her verbal commands that she chose to ignore. He then simply escalated his force to stay just above her escalating force to stay in control of the situation as safely for him AND HER as possible. Fucking damned if you do or don't apparently.
All you are doing is analyzing the situation with your emotions. Use logic and reason instead. Don't be a liberal.
She simply should have abided momentarily, got her money and quit doing business there, and aimed that passion and effort in the right direction to obtain true satisfaction.