Trespassing and resisting arrest. You faggots are all about it when it's some liberal or thug who isn't following orders. You're just as inconsistent and hypocritical as the left.
If you want to refuse service for any reason you must have locked doors and be appointment only, etc. the second you unlock your doors and let people freely waltz in uninvited then you can no longer refuse them service.
By opening the doors to the public the business has asked me to come in. By asking me to come in I now have a right to be there. Unless I’m breaking a law you cannot revoke the invitation because my right to be somewhere supersedes your business’s rights.
Remember this isn’t a home or residence. It’s a place of public gathering. Your individual rights to be somewhere prevent a corporation from revoking your invitation.
Imagine a business putting cameras in the bathrooms of their building. Clearly your right to privacy overrides their right to put security cameras wherever they please so this isn’t some weird or novel concept.
But that’s the thing about HIPAA, it’s a health information privacy act. She could have a medical condition that could prevent her from wearing the mask and she should not be asked nor forced to reveal it to gain access to a particular service.
She also should not have to present her vaccination records either. I wanna know if there are any HIPAA lawsuits getting started because I would totally sue on that basis.
She never said anything about having a medical issue preventing her from wearing a mask. If that is the case then all she had to do was say so. She would not have to reveal specifics and that would have changed the situation. That isn't what happened.
My comment was a hypothetical. IF she did, she shouldn’t be asked and she shouldn’t have to reveal. Therefore, the assumption of a pre-existing condition should always be there. These policies are violating people’s civil rights.
Not at all. She can be asked to wear a mask. Her response can be "I cannot wear a mask due to a medical condition" and at that point the business must leave her alone. She does not have to reveal what her medical condition is but she does have to inform the business that that is her reason for not wearing a mask.
Private companies can refuse service for any reason outside of race religion or sex. They SHOULD be able to refuse service for ANY reason.
Then we all need to pass laws banning the mandatory use of face masks in all places.
Hopefully that’s what North Dakota is doing!
What part of refusing service includes being tackled by police?
Trespassing and resisting arrest. You faggots are all about it when it's some liberal or thug who isn't following orders. You're just as inconsistent and hypocritical as the left.
Not if you’re open to the public.
If you want to refuse service for any reason you must have locked doors and be appointment only, etc. the second you unlock your doors and let people freely waltz in uninvited then you can no longer refuse them service.
Finally someone who understands what public space is doesn’t confuse it with property rights.
This simply isn't true. You're wrong. 🤷🏻♂️
Of course I’m not wrong.
By opening the doors to the public the business has asked me to come in. By asking me to come in I now have a right to be there. Unless I’m breaking a law you cannot revoke the invitation because my right to be somewhere supersedes your business’s rights.
Remember this isn’t a home or residence. It’s a place of public gathering. Your individual rights to be somewhere prevent a corporation from revoking your invitation.
Imagine a business putting cameras in the bathrooms of their building. Clearly your right to privacy overrides their right to put security cameras wherever they please so this isn’t some weird or novel concept.
Of course you are wrong. Please educate yourself and promptly piss off.
https://www.mydoorsign.com/blog/right-to-refuse-service-to-anyone/
But that’s the thing about HIPAA, it’s a health information privacy act. She could have a medical condition that could prevent her from wearing the mask and she should not be asked nor forced to reveal it to gain access to a particular service.
She also should not have to present her vaccination records either. I wanna know if there are any HIPAA lawsuits getting started because I would totally sue on that basis.
She never said anything about having a medical issue preventing her from wearing a mask. If that is the case then all she had to do was say so. She would not have to reveal specifics and that would have changed the situation. That isn't what happened.
My comment was a hypothetical. IF she did, she shouldn’t be asked and she shouldn’t have to reveal. Therefore, the assumption of a pre-existing condition should always be there. These policies are violating people’s civil rights.
Not at all. She can be asked to wear a mask. Her response can be "I cannot wear a mask due to a medical condition" and at that point the business must leave her alone. She does not have to reveal what her medical condition is but she does have to inform the business that that is her reason for not wearing a mask.