Lmao, that's a nice logical fallacy you got there. Reading comprehension helps here. I'm not for the bank. Fuck them. Simply, if you're going to use your energy to do some form of protest, be smart and the most effective with it. That lady knew, or should have known, the outcome of her chosen course of action. She looked like an idiot and did zero damage to the bank. That's not winning with your brain. That's throwing a fucking temper tantrum like the lefties we often make fun of and are disgusted by.
“Those blacks didnt do any damage to the restaurant, they just looked like idiots getting beat up in the streets, covered in milkshakes and steak fries”
“Just throwing a temper tantrum, they knew what the outcome would be when they decided to do that terrible, despicable, unspeakable offense”
Devils advocate is a useful tool to get people to provide nuance to their argument, and make sure that minority opinions can get an answer to the questions they raise.
But the issue is that if the logical response to someone not following a law/rule is to throw them to the floor and beat them, we should make sure the law/rule is important enough to warrant that.
Not wearing a useless mask when its not flu season, while not inside of a nursing home for 100 year old diabetic aids patients, is not a good reason to throw a 65 year old woman to the floor.
By your logic, do people beheaded for drawing Mohammed deserve it? We all know the muslims will enforce that rule with deadly force. Should we not condemn them just because they made it clear what the punishment was beforehand? Its not like its difficult not to draw Mohammad, you can’t exactly draw him by accident.
Lmao, that's a nice logical fallacy you got there. Reading comprehension helps here. I'm not for the bank. Fuck them. Simply, if you're going to use your energy to do some form of protest, be smart and the most effective with it. That lady knew, or should have known, the outcome of her chosen course of action. She looked like an idiot and did zero damage to the bank. That's not winning with your brain. That's throwing a fucking temper tantrum like the lefties we often make fun of and are disgusted by.
“Those blacks didnt do any damage to the restaurant, they just looked like idiots getting beat up in the streets, covered in milkshakes and steak fries”
“Just throwing a temper tantrum, they knew what the outcome would be when they decided to do that terrible, despicable, unspeakable offense”
Devils advocate is a useful tool to get people to provide nuance to their argument, and make sure that minority opinions can get an answer to the questions they raise.
But the issue is that if the logical response to someone not following a law/rule is to throw them to the floor and beat them, we should make sure the law/rule is important enough to warrant that.
Not wearing a useless mask when its not flu season, while not inside of a nursing home for 100 year old diabetic aids patients, is not a good reason to throw a 65 year old woman to the floor.
By your logic, do people beheaded for drawing Mohammed deserve it? We all know the muslims will enforce that rule with deadly force. Should we not condemn them just because they made it clear what the punishment was beforehand? Its not like its difficult not to draw Mohammad, you can’t exactly draw him by accident.