I did read the article shithead, and I noticed how the data was manipulated to remove a bunch of people from the population, ie children, spouses, etc to see how it was inflated to make it more dramatic.
It’s incredible that you’re trying to defend manipulated statistics.
Lmfao you must be retarded because the link you sent me says it was 5% of whites that owned slaves in the south.
Manipulating figures to get a higher percentage isn’t what statistics are designed for.
I used snopes because I thought it was a source equal to that of your intelligence. Looks like I gave you too much credit tho :)
I did read the article shithead, and I noticed how the data was manipulated to remove a bunch of people from the population, ie children, spouses, etc to see how it was inflated to make it more dramatic.
It’s incredible that you’re trying to defend manipulated statistics.
Lol it is like some bernout leftist just wondered into the maga camp. "STATS ARE RACIST!"