1693
Science Disagrees 100% (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Mukzn ago by Mukzn +1693 / -0
Comments (162)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, but regardless of what the dictionaries say, actual real people did not use the two terms interchangeably. That is a fact. Forms and applications also did not use "gender," they used "sex." I know this because I was alive back then and witnessed the change.

Otherwise, yes, we agree.

1
SellTheSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said that gender is a synonym for biological sex, and you strangely claimed that it wasn't. I showed you proof that it is, that's really all there is to it.

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

As it is currently used, "gender" is decidedly not a synonym for biological sex. We agreed on this.

Then you made a number of statements about how the two terms were used interchangeably until "gender" was hijacked. Those statements are simply not accurate.

If I had to guess, I'd say you're too young to know better, but that isn't stopping you from making assertions about how things used to be.

1
SellTheSun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once you deny irrefutable proof that you're wrong, you disqualify yourself from being able to have a constructive conversation. What, you think John money invented the word gender? 😂

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good grief. We're going around in circles. Of course he didn't invent the word. You've claimed gender was used interchangeably with sex prior to the hijacking of the word gender by the left, including on forms and applications, which is totally false, and you haven't attempted any demonstration of proof of this assertion. A dictionary definition does not equate to common usage. Do Americans use "automobile" in conversation just as much as they use "car?" Of course they don't, even though a dictionary will tell you the two words are synonyms. Irrefutable proof, lol. Take it up with someone who believes your nonsense.