good. this is unreasonable search and seizure. The space above your house is part of your private property up to a certain elevation, this is also trespassing. And if Ohio has a 2 party consent law for recording, this is also unlawful.
I wonder if the officers operating the drones have their FAA Unmanned arial vehicle operator licenses? To operate a drone for commercial purposes I believe you need one.
ahhh yes the rookie cop who likes planes finds he can ramp people... then has no idea what he needs to ask you for nor has probably ever seen a pilot's license... They are very colorful.
I think those laws are based on state, and just would hazard a guess it depends on the size of the drone.
A coworker bought a pair of rc planes, and actually had to register one with the faa becauae of its size, which i cant imagine anybody older than 3 thinking it was a full size plane...
I agree with you as long as the property surveilled is their curtilage and they have installed sufficient coverage to prevent view from a public roadway (fence, hedge, trees). They would then have a (diminished) expectation of privacy.
The issue are the SCOTUS decisions in California v. Ciraolo (fixed wing aircraft surveillance from 1,000 ft) and Florida v. Riley (helicopter surveillance of a greenhouse from 400 ft above private property).
yeah, like I said, from a certain elevation. Apparently not 1000 ft, nor 400 ft, but this drone which is 20-50 ft or so would, i assume, fall into that expectation of privacy.
But as another user pointed out, this photo is from Australia, and I dont know the laws there, more cucked than the US though but I dont know in what capacity.
good. this is unreasonable search and seizure. The space above your house is part of your private property up to a certain elevation, this is also trespassing. And if Ohio has a 2 party consent law for recording, this is also unlawful.
Its illegal in 2 potentially 3 aspects.
I wonder if the officers operating the drones have their FAA Unmanned arial vehicle operator licenses? To operate a drone for commercial purposes I believe you need one.
Very unlikely since when I was flying I got ramped by local PD and none of them know the regulations.
ahhh yes the rookie cop who likes planes finds he can ramp people... then has no idea what he needs to ask you for nor has probably ever seen a pilot's license... They are very colorful.
Its a satire page on fb
Especially if the drone is out of LOS
I think those laws are based on state, and just would hazard a guess it depends on the size of the drone.
A coworker bought a pair of rc planes, and actually had to register one with the faa becauae of its size, which i cant imagine anybody older than 3 thinking it was a full size plane...
Anyhoo, just tossing that out as consideration
Look at the fb page..... satire
yeah too good to be true
Ohio is a 1 party state.
I agree with you as long as the property surveilled is their curtilage and they have installed sufficient coverage to prevent view from a public roadway (fence, hedge, trees). They would then have a (diminished) expectation of privacy.
The issue are the SCOTUS decisions in California v. Ciraolo (fixed wing aircraft surveillance from 1,000 ft) and Florida v. Riley (helicopter surveillance of a greenhouse from 400 ft above private property).
yeah, like I said, from a certain elevation. Apparently not 1000 ft, nor 400 ft, but this drone which is 20-50 ft or so would, i assume, fall into that expectation of privacy.
But as another user pointed out, this photo is from Australia, and I dont know the laws there, more cucked than the US though but I dont know in what capacity.