Those men and women go into battle and die because a US President say so.
You don't get the concept do you. How old old are you?
I haven't served, but I've known a ton of WWII soldiers, fewer Korean War vets, more than a few Vietnam soldiers and then even more soldiers who were on the ground in Afghanistan and the ME.
Which one of those conflicts was initiated by the Pentagon?
You seem to have gotten your conception of the military by watching a couple episodes of G.I. Joe and maybe a stadium flyover or recruiting commercial.
I’d try to disabuse you of the notion that the military is a bunch of pretty-uniformed knights slaying CGI dragons or snipers with 300 confirmed kills, but I’ll just keep it simple stupid and build on the PowerPoint with this:
The idea ain’t to go into battle and die because a President say so...
Now, in regards to your question:
WWII - initiated on false premises that included the pentagon hiding intercepted communications...
Korea - instigated by the U.N., and a penultimate textbook example of Pentagon-led strategic military failure, including attrition-based metrics and intransigent use of outdated and ineffective tactics.
Vietnam Nam - Began using a pentagon-directed false flag, and included a famous example of a Pentagon cover-up of a civilian massacre, as well as further mismanagement. A war conducted so foolishly it turned a whole generation of war-loving Americans into commie-loving peaceniks.
Afghanistan - An interagency failure of epic proportions, most notable for lasting longer than any armed conflict in U.S. history, placing U.S. troops to guard Taliban opium poppy fields and provide security for boy-rape parties, and failing to accomplish a single objective — or even outline a strategy, due to Pentagon pressure “to provide data that the U.S. was succeeding, even though it was impossible to create good metrics.” Contrary to their own confidentially-stated assessments, Pentagon generals directly lied to Congress and the American people repeatedly claiming that ‘progress’ was being made.
Middle East - Need I remind you that the Pentagon funded Osama Bin Ladin (and Saddam), participated in a hoax to convince Americans of the presence of nuclear/biological weapons in Iraq, helped Obama lie about Al Queda’s presence in Afghanistan despite knowing they had left the area, and literally put ISIS leaders together and created a metrics-driven witch hunt style runaway torture machine that helped raise an army of terrorists for the caliphate?
The Pentagon’s bumbling, dirty fingerprints are all over each and every one of these military treasure-pit clusterfucks, and they couldn’t create a decisive winning engagement in ANY of them!
Fuck off shill.
This a hill I'm willing to die on.
Check back in an hour or so after your mom brings your Kraft Mac 'n Cheese down to the basement.
That will give you time to shed your pussy feelings and put on some facts.
You won't do that because you exemplify "Reeee".
Fuck off.
What hill? Yellow ribbons? Boot-licking interagency failures isn’t going to get you a combat action ribbon — except in today’s military, it does!
REMF fags can suck Jody’s ladydick. There’s a mound you can die on, shipmate.
Those men and women go into battle and die because a US President say so.
You don't get the concept do you. How old old are you?
I haven't served, but I've known a ton of WWII soldiers, fewer Korean War vets, more than a few Vietnam soldiers and then even more soldiers who were on the ground in Afghanistan and the ME.
Which one of those conflicts was initiated by the Pentagon?
Name one, you fucking shill.
You seem to have gotten your conception of the military by watching a couple episodes of G.I. Joe and maybe a stadium flyover or recruiting commercial.
I’d try to disabuse you of the notion that the military is a bunch of pretty-uniformed knights slaying CGI dragons or snipers with 300 confirmed kills, but I’ll just keep it simple stupid and build on the PowerPoint with this:
The idea ain’t to go into battle and die because a President say so...
Now, in regards to your question:
WWII - initiated on false premises that included the pentagon hiding intercepted communications...
Korea - instigated by the U.N., and a penultimate textbook example of Pentagon-led strategic military failure, including attrition-based metrics and intransigent use of outdated and ineffective tactics.
Vietnam Nam - Began using a pentagon-directed false flag, and included a famous example of a Pentagon cover-up of a civilian massacre, as well as further mismanagement. A war conducted so foolishly it turned a whole generation of war-loving Americans into commie-loving peaceniks.
Afghanistan - An interagency failure of epic proportions, most notable for lasting longer than any armed conflict in U.S. history, placing U.S. troops to guard Taliban opium poppy fields and provide security for boy-rape parties, and failing to accomplish a single objective — or even outline a strategy, due to Pentagon pressure “to provide data that the U.S. was succeeding, even though it was impossible to create good metrics.” Contrary to their own confidentially-stated assessments, Pentagon generals directly lied to Congress and the American people repeatedly claiming that ‘progress’ was being made.
Middle East - Need I remind you that the Pentagon funded Osama Bin Ladin (and Saddam), participated in a hoax to convince Americans of the presence of nuclear/biological weapons in Iraq, helped Obama lie about Al Queda’s presence in Afghanistan despite knowing they had left the area, and literally put ISIS leaders together and created a metrics-driven witch hunt style runaway torture machine that helped raise an army of terrorists for the caliphate?
The Pentagon’s bumbling, dirty fingerprints are all over each and every one of these military treasure-pit clusterfucks, and they couldn’t create a decisive winning engagement in ANY of them!
https://nypost.com/2019/12/14/lying-by-bush-and-obama-over-afghanistan-is-this-eras-pentagon-papers/