110
Comments (17)
sorted by:
15
COnDEMnED 15 points ago +15 / -0

Did they meet the Men’s qualification standard, or did they need a watered down version? How you answer may prove a point.

10
cheddar [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I just find it weird that a General has to virtue signal on twitter.

6
UnemployedMarx 6 points ago +6 / -0

The US military's sign up numbers are dwindling and worse yet the number of fighting age men in shape to fight is abysmally low. The leadership probably believe they can tap into women as a way to get new recruits and bolster their fighting numbers. It's obviously a top down strategy so it's not unusual for the officers to promote the strategy. Unfortunately, this will just spell disaster just like women in the workforce. If the number of fighting aged men, people signing up and people in shape to fight is dwindling you need to tackle the underlying social issues not patch the problem with women.

4
marishiten 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's even more sad because he's shitting on Cucker. I was under the impression that you take an oath when you enlist in the Military. And that oath says something about how they'll defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic. So the military is going to shit on a Cape Cod Trust Fund Yuppie bitch for exercising his first amendment? Something that General swore to protect until his death?

And what happened with the Military being apolitical? They shouldn't be jumping into these things. Actually, it's against the UCMJ to be political as an officer and state those political views publicly. Think he's going to get court martialed? Think he's going to have to resign to the Secretary of Defense? Yeah, I didn't either.

2
cheddar [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would have thought that a General would have more sense than to engage in a twitter feud about what some talking head had to say.

2
Skogin 2 points ago +2 / -0

The General has been wearing a cuck mask all year and can’t think straight.

5
boreal_storm 5 points ago +5 / -0

General Simp does not convince me.

4
Reborned20 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you for Your Service and Oath to the US Constitution, Military Patriots.

And the rest can go ..................

3
aloha_snackbar22 3 points ago +3 / -0

The US Military is only good because of the insane amount of $$$$ we put into technology.

The actual service members, bar a few, are just a bunch of diversity hires that wouldn't last 30 secs in a real battlefield.

3
Winged_Splinter 3 points ago +3 / -0

So selective service for women has been added a requirement along side men?

No?

Oh, well shove your grandstanding up your toothless hole.

2
giantrabbit1 2 points ago +3 / -1

STOP SUCKING CUCKER TARLSON'S DICK!!! HE SAID THERE WAS "NO FRAUD"

He lost all credibility with me after that. Also idc if women serve in the military insofar that they are held to the same physical standard and don't compromise combat readiness.

Also much of the DOD these days includes intelligence, cyber, and other such roles. Warfare has evolved a lot over the years. I'd imagine that they have women serving in those roles too where physique is not of concern.

2
LatitudeofMind 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are no fans of Tucker but I think there’s a larger picture here- a general Twitter feuding with a civilian

2
marishiten 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, lul Army.

You know, back in the day, that meant something. But ever since the 90's, our Military is a fucking embarrassment.

2
k_the_c 2 points ago +2 / -0

Am I the only one who laughs at the name General Funk? Sounds like a character from a kids cartoon.

1
Lurker404 1 point ago +1 / -0

This whole thing is so absurd. The Marines get triggered by a talking head and they lose their shit on social media.

Good times create weak men, indeed.

1
MeMargie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your Squad allowed Treason will the overthrow of our Vote for President Trump!

1
Shmioighan 1 point ago +1 / -0

At least we still have PMCs.