Wasnt that supposed to be 1/6? What the hell was Trump thinking? Bring all these Patriots to DC then tell them to go home and then theyre all branded domestic terrorists. Great plan
1/6 was only ever a nonviolent peaceful demonstration — no one even had guns!
Trump told them to go home when it became clear that the Uniparty traitors had planned a reversal. That kind of thing happens when the enemy intercepts your plans, no matter how good they might be... your convoy of peace turns into a roadside ambush, and all you can do is maneuver your way out and live to fight another day.
Also, keep in mind those patriots’ sacrifice did more to finally pull the curtains back on the Uniparty schemes than 4 years of the Trump administration could. That alone made it a massive accomplishment of a vital strategic objective. The Boston tea party wasn’t about a single shipment of tea leaves!
I think the founding fathers expected the 2nd to be used before a fraudulent election becomes ossified. Whoops. Seems that we missed our que on the 6th because we were all waiting to see what Trump and/or his team had up his sleeve. Which turned out to be nothing despite the PPV hype machine.
Trump still hasn't given us a "debrief" on what exactly happened and what his thought process was. Just seems to be going through the motions and endorsing people for the republican party, which is good but pretty low energy compared to how he's been since he came down the escalator.
If he's no longer got it, why not give Jnr. a shot, not that voting means much now anyway. Sure you can slowly reform the system from the bottom up and remove the mechanisms that enabled the fraud, but meanwhile Biden can destroy at a much faster rate so that the senile old man is at the wheel.
The founding fathers recognized that resistance to tyranny was slow to follow specific occurrences, because they discussed it at length, so I don’t think you’re right about your underlying assumption.
There was a plan, a huge plan. I thing it was Peter Navarro, who, accidentally I think, gave us a small glimpse of it a few weeks ago when he was discussing the horrifying treachery of Mike Pence.
I can't find a reference or the video I saw back then, but Mr.Navarro (I think) said something about how it was going to be like some legendary athlete's (a quarterback, I think) sweep to victory and he named the 5 States. It all hinged on Mike Pence, the fate of our Republic hinged on a few seconds in Mike Pence's life as he stood before Congress on 1/6.
I think Mike Pence, who in my opinion was a traitor from the get go, never intended to carry out the plan, but led them all to believe he would. They trusted Pence until when, in the end, he stopped taking their calls.
There is a spot in President Trumps speech on the 6th where you get a glimpse of his uncertainty about Pence.
Peter Navarro, being the gentleman he is, provided some cover for Pence by telling how Pence's chief of staff had isolated him so no one could talk to him for the days or weeks running up to the 6th. Peter also told how he got a phone call early on the day of the 6th, the caller got one or two words out and then the call was disconnected. He said he knew it was Mike Pence and he implied that someone else had disconnected the call, and maybe so, but I wonder.
Wasnt that supposed to be 1/6? What the hell was Trump thinking? Bring all these Patriots to DC then tell them to go home and then theyre all branded domestic terrorists. Great plan
1/6 was only ever a nonviolent peaceful demonstration — no one even had guns!
Trump told them to go home when it became clear that the Uniparty traitors had planned a reversal. That kind of thing happens when the enemy intercepts your plans, no matter how good they might be... your convoy of peace turns into a roadside ambush, and all you can do is maneuver your way out and live to fight another day.
Also, keep in mind those patriots’ sacrifice did more to finally pull the curtains back on the Uniparty schemes than 4 years of the Trump administration could. That alone made it a massive accomplishment of a vital strategic objective. The Boston tea party wasn’t about a single shipment of tea leaves!
I think the founding fathers expected the 2nd to be used before a fraudulent election becomes ossified. Whoops. Seems that we missed our que on the 6th because we were all waiting to see what Trump and/or his team had up his sleeve. Which turned out to be nothing despite the PPV hype machine.
Trump still hasn't given us a "debrief" on what exactly happened and what his thought process was. Just seems to be going through the motions and endorsing people for the republican party, which is good but pretty low energy compared to how he's been since he came down the escalator.
If he's no longer got it, why not give Jnr. a shot, not that voting means much now anyway. Sure you can slowly reform the system from the bottom up and remove the mechanisms that enabled the fraud, but meanwhile Biden can destroy at a much faster rate so that the senile old man is at the wheel.
The founding fathers recognized that resistance to tyranny was slow to follow specific occurrences, because they discussed it at length, so I don’t think you’re right about your underlying assumption.
There was a plan, a huge plan. I thing it was Peter Navarro, who, accidentally I think, gave us a small glimpse of it a few weeks ago when he was discussing the horrifying treachery of Mike Pence.
I can't find a reference or the video I saw back then, but Mr.Navarro (I think) said something about how it was going to be like some legendary athlete's (a quarterback, I think) sweep to victory and he named the 5 States. It all hinged on Mike Pence, the fate of our Republic hinged on a few seconds in Mike Pence's life as he stood before Congress on 1/6.
I think Mike Pence, who in my opinion was a traitor from the get go, never intended to carry out the plan, but led them all to believe he would. They trusted Pence until when, in the end, he stopped taking their calls.
There is a spot in President Trumps speech on the 6th where you get a glimpse of his uncertainty about Pence.
Peter Navarro, being the gentleman he is, provided some cover for Pence by telling how Pence's chief of staff had isolated him so no one could talk to him for the days or weeks running up to the 6th. Peter also told how he got a phone call early on the day of the 6th, the caller got one or two words out and then the call was disconnected. He said he knew it was Mike Pence and he implied that someone else had disconnected the call, and maybe so, but I wonder.