I think the founding fathers expected the 2nd to be used before a fraudulent election becomes ossified. Whoops. Seems that we missed our que on the 6th because we were all waiting to see what Trump and/or his team had up his sleeve. Which turned out to be nothing despite the PPV hype machine.
Trump still hasn't given us a "debrief" on what exactly happened and what his thought process was. Just seems to be going through the motions and endorsing people for the republican party, which is good but pretty low energy compared to how he's been since he came down the escalator.
If he's no longer got it, why not give Jnr. a shot, not that voting means much now anyway. Sure you can slowly reform the system from the bottom up and remove the mechanisms that enabled the fraud, but meanwhile Biden can destroy at a much faster rate so that the senile old man is at the wheel.
The founding fathers recognized that resistance to tyranny was slow to follow specific occurrences, because they discussed it at length, so I don’t think you’re right about your underlying assumption.
I think the founding fathers expected the 2nd to be used before a fraudulent election becomes ossified. Whoops. Seems that we missed our que on the 6th because we were all waiting to see what Trump and/or his team had up his sleeve. Which turned out to be nothing despite the PPV hype machine.
Trump still hasn't given us a "debrief" on what exactly happened and what his thought process was. Just seems to be going through the motions and endorsing people for the republican party, which is good but pretty low energy compared to how he's been since he came down the escalator.
If he's no longer got it, why not give Jnr. a shot, not that voting means much now anyway. Sure you can slowly reform the system from the bottom up and remove the mechanisms that enabled the fraud, but meanwhile Biden can destroy at a much faster rate so that the senile old man is at the wheel.
The founding fathers recognized that resistance to tyranny was slow to follow specific occurrences, because they discussed it at length, so I don’t think you’re right about your underlying assumption.