It would be a shame if they were subpoena’d and asked by a member of congress if “shadowbanning doesn’t exist, then why does the algorithm auto-ban users based on certain key words?” Instant way to prove they are lying.
Youtube automatically deletes posts that have certain words which generally all revolve around Cultural Marxist notions of right and wrong. Or in other words they set up wrong-think auto policing, and in so doing are further creating and cementing echo-chambers.
This is why Section 230 protections have to be modified to stop the tech giants from auto cultivating content they are in fundamental conflict with Section 230 as intended. The tech giants have gotten away with fraudulent terms of service claims for too long and need be severely punished for improperly silencing people.
But they don't "shadow ban"! They just "limit" your account so that no one else can see your tweets or interact with you. Totally not a "shadow ban"...whatever that is... /s
I believe that in due course big tech is going to be faced with major lawsuits because of their blackout of open dialogue regarding Covid-19 by the medical profession.
Had big tech not have shut down open dialogue, particularly when it came to the medical profession, the country could have made far better decisions a lot earlier. Instead, they claimed they were following the science when, in fact, they were influencing a political agenda.
There is so much evidence now of Dr. Fauci mishandling this pandemic yet big tech would not let better minds participate in the debate. No scientific community should ever base their decisions on one man's opinions (particularly one man in government in his 80s) and big tech are certainly not the one's that should be deciding which medical opinions are worthwhile.
Unless these lawsuits are from private citizens with deep enough pockets to fight them all the way to the Supreme Court, exactly nothing is going to happen. Biden’s DOJ won’t touch this with a ten foot pole. Merrick Garland doesn’t even know whether it’s illegal to cross the border without permission.
Well then thank God Merrick Garland is not on the Supreme Court (not that we have many the represent the law or the Constitution at the moment) but that does seem to be the goal of the left. Pack all the courts, AGs and prosecutorial positions with people that are willing to work against the laws and Constitution despite their oath of office.
Perhaps Judicial Watch, with private funding, could file a suit.
Shadow ban is a specific term that basically means you are banned (but don’t even know it), basically they block the ability for people to see your tweets but don’t tell you they did that.
They’re being propped up by shadow money, they have to be. Look at their stock price, it makes zero sense. Everyone, and I mean everyone knows they’ve hemorrhages millions of users, yet their stock is going up?
Complete kabuki theater, they’re getting injected will capital from somewhere or the elites are simply manipulating the stock price ticker
I bet that it's the Fed's cheap money spigot sloshing around that is the culprit. If we see a tightening in the money supply, I expect a lot of businesses to go bust. It's like a time bomb.
reddit does this shit too. Seems to be the tool of choice for leftist censors
It would be a shame if they were subpoena’d and asked by a member of congress if “shadowbanning doesn’t exist, then why does the algorithm auto-ban users based on certain key words?” Instant way to prove they are lying.
Back in Feb/March of 2020 I kept trying to post this article on Reddit in many of the China virus subs:
Universal and reusable virus deactivation system for respiratory protection
I'd even Archive it repeatedly and post the archive links. It took longer for them to target the Archive links, but they would shadow ban every one.
They wouldn't allow this article to be seen either:
A 3D adapter can turn a snorkeling mask into a non-invasive ventilator
Just discovered that /r/Worldnews allowed it to be posted, but the top awarded comments try to claim it's useless.
Youtube automatically deletes posts that have certain words which generally all revolve around Cultural Marxist notions of right and wrong. Or in other words they set up wrong-think auto policing, and in so doing are further creating and cementing echo-chambers.
This is why Section 230 protections have to be modified to stop the tech giants from auto cultivating content they are in fundamental conflict with Section 230 as intended. The tech giants have gotten away with fraudulent terms of service claims for too long and need be severely punished for improperly silencing people.
But they don't "shadow ban"! They just "limit" your account so that no one else can see your tweets or interact with you. Totally not a "shadow ban"...whatever that is... /s
Shadow ban means you don't know you're limited or locked out of your account. When you get a notice that you're banned, you're not shadow banned.
I believe that in due course big tech is going to be faced with major lawsuits because of their blackout of open dialogue regarding Covid-19 by the medical profession.
Had big tech not have shut down open dialogue, particularly when it came to the medical profession, the country could have made far better decisions a lot earlier. Instead, they claimed they were following the science when, in fact, they were influencing a political agenda.
There is so much evidence now of Dr. Fauci mishandling this pandemic yet big tech would not let better minds participate in the debate. No scientific community should ever base their decisions on one man's opinions (particularly one man in government in his 80s) and big tech are certainly not the one's that should be deciding which medical opinions are worthwhile.
Unless these lawsuits are from private citizens with deep enough pockets to fight them all the way to the Supreme Court, exactly nothing is going to happen. Biden’s DOJ won’t touch this with a ten foot pole. Merrick Garland doesn’t even know whether it’s illegal to cross the border without permission.
Well then thank God Merrick Garland is not on the Supreme Court (not that we have many the represent the law or the Constitution at the moment) but that does seem to be the goal of the left. Pack all the courts, AGs and prosecutorial positions with people that are willing to work against the laws and Constitution despite their oath of office.
Perhaps Judicial Watch, with private funding, could file a suit.
SCOTUS is already fucked without his help.
Shadow ban is a specific term that basically means you are banned (but don’t even know it), basically they block the ability for people to see your tweets but don’t tell you they did that.
and some never get to know it
What happened in Memphis? I don’t get it?
Probably a scheduled false flag operation that Twitter jumped the gun on suppressing discussion of.
Sounds about right.
It's not a "bug" it's a feature.
Tired of these “twitter sucks” posts. WE KNOW TWITTER IS COMMUNIST CENTRAL FFS
There’s like 1000 postseason day for years about shit they ban or hypocrites everyday. We get it
It's not about hipocricy. It's about lying in front of a Congress
When has that ever carried a consequence for someone who is part of the establishment? I cant think of a single instance, means less than nothing
Me responding Jack explain how twitter works: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
They're hemorrhaging people. Can't see this lasting long. Penny stock in 5 years.
They’re being propped up by shadow money, they have to be. Look at their stock price, it makes zero sense. Everyone, and I mean everyone knows they’ve hemorrhages millions of users, yet their stock is going up?
Complete kabuki theater, they’re getting injected will capital from somewhere or the elites are simply manipulating the stock price ticker
I bet that it's the Fed's cheap money spigot sloshing around that is the culprit. If we see a tightening in the money supply, I expect a lot of businesses to go bust. It's like a time bomb.