Since the pharmaceutical industry is immune from liability I asked my doctor if he gives me the vaccine can I sue him under his medical malpractice insurance for $1 million if anything goes wrong.
He advised me it’s best I not take the vaccine
Comments (119)
sorted by:
Just curious, where did you get that the spikes encoded by RNA vaccines become integrated into the external membrane of host cells? I've just read that they encode the spike, but not where they go (such that some are excreted and detected in plasma and then detected everywhere, I assumed).
Also never heard that this was related to passing the blood brain barrier. If true, whether the artificial spikes get attached to something else in the blood and allow improper BBB penetration is important. But going on the past comment that you said they will be on the extracellular surface of cells, it does not seem likely that entire cells would migrate into the brain. My understanding is the spike allows binding to cellular membranes and entry by endocytosis. In general, that is something we should study more before allowing in a vaccine. Might be many things that could go wrong if it gets mixed up with the wrong proteins at the wrong place, but I'm unsure what about the BBB is a particular risk.
That's kind of the problem, we don't know exactly how these spike proteins are being presented. From what I've read, it's immune system cells that are made to present the spike protein, and obviously these cells are able to move throughout the body. Either way, the spike protein itself is a problem, whether it's regular cells excreting it or immune cells presenting it. Especially since epithelial tissue is found all over, not just at the blood brain barrier.
Just a few random articles on the spike protein and BBB connection.
https://www.templehealth.org/about/news/sars-cov-2-spike-proteins-disrupt-the-blood-brain-barrier-potentially-raising-risk-of-neurological-damage-in-covid-19-patients
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201029141941.htm
And I think a lot of the side effects we've seen with the "vaccine" make a lot of sense when you consider the spike protein and epithelial tissue interaction. We've also had cases where people were given more doses than prescribed, and they immediately had severe reactions just from the extra dose, so clearly, the extra dose causes extra spike protein generation, which then becomes enough for the spike protein problem to be seen in full force.
Thanks for the info.
About the immune cells presenting it, I think naturally they are involved and respond to it, but did not see anything indicating they'll be the ones infected with the vaccine to produce the spike. I haven't been able to dig up actual studies or data that indicates what cells will take the vaccine and make the antigen. Which is a stunning thing. I would expect this to have been studied. I can't even find information about the carrier for the antigenic encoding sequence after searching. One link said it was taken up by the cells at the injection site, indicating it is random and non-specific. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-01-covid-vaccine-critical.html
This is the only place I've found something that indicates how the gene mod works:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
"COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are given in the upper arm muscle. Once the instructions (mRNA) are inside the immune cells, the cells use them to make the protein piece".
The question is....is it only immune cells that are affected....and they say it triggers an immune response, but they try to dance around what an immune response entails: The immune cells attacking whatever cells they're targeting. So how much internal damage is this doing? If it's passing the blood brain barrier and potentially getting into brain cells....that could potentially trigger an immune response against brain cells. Depending on where in the body the spike protein presents itself, it could potentially lead to things like nerve damage, brain damage, etc. And that would explain the bells palsy side effect, if enough damage was done to specific areas, even if randomly.
"To keep the mRNA from disintegrating when it enters the body, the COVID-19 vaccines use fat bubbles to shuttle the mRNA to certain cells."
I'm not sure how it would be discriminate enough to only affect immune cells, especially since it is just fat bubbles. Seems to me that as soon as these "fat bubbles" come into contact with any cells lipid layer, it would effectively be absorbed into the cell where the mRNA can do its work. So unless there's another component to the "vaccine" like nano robots, I don't see how it would be able to target only immune cells.
And none of this gets around the problem with the spike protein itself. They say it's harmless, yet as we've seen in those links about the BBB issue with COVID, it's not really harmless since it's on record as compromising the BBB, which means it can also compromise the same processes that take place in other cells such as organs, nerves, etc.
On top of that, it's not like one cell will be given just one piece of code. So what happens when a single cell, even if just an immune cell, is given many copies of the code to make the spike protein? It seems like eventually it would have to shed/flake off that protein, which effectively means you would end up with spike protein free floating through the body, that can end up anywhere, on any cell....cells that the immune system will then target.
Nov 27 2020: mRna, “Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?” https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
I think a lot of things can potentially go wrong, though to me some of the ideas in the blog seem less likely than most speculation.
The idea that vaccine RNA can be integrated by endogenous retroviruses is very unlikely, I think. If I remember right, only one family has activity in humans. HERV-K appears to be the only active one. Usually in cancer, or as the link suggested, stem cells (though to what degree in stem cells I'm not sure). Mainly, RNA induced expression systems are used in induced-pluripotent stem cells very often. The expression invariably remains transient, even when researchers don't like it to. Researchers likely would have noticed this, even by accident, at this point, and the experiments have been done to trillions of cells for different experiments over years.
Actually, one reason why this may not happen relates to one of the things I consider a cause to worry about side effects. When your cells is infected with RNA, part of the immune response is the destruction of that cell. It's not all just an antibody-based immunity. Presumably, a cell permanently expressing the spike antigen will be eventually destroyed. The bad thing about that idea is the random cell destruction that occurs could be harmful in a variety of ways.
The other idea about splicing into another virus that was infecting the same cell is beyond my expertise, but I haven't heard of viruses co-opting other elements that are not a stable part of the genome. It could be a freak accident occurrence, but IMO far less likely than the other things that go wrong.