Since the pharmaceutical industry is immune from liability I asked my doctor if he gives me the vaccine can I sue him under his medical malpractice insurance for $1 million if anything goes wrong.
He advised me it’s best I not take the vaccine
Comments (119)
sorted by:
Apparently we're supposed to believe that it genetically modifies your cells to present COVID protein spikes on the surface, and do it only once. But even then that's a problem, because the COVID protein spikes themselves are physically harmful to epithelial cells and damage the blood brain barrier. These protein spikes are what effectively allows COVID to pass the blood brain barrier, and the "vaccine" is a gene mod that literally makes your cells produce those harmful protein spikes. So these protein spikes are not just harmless identification markers for the immune system, they're actually part of the harmful element of COVID.
What this means is there can be a wide range of long term illness effects brought about by the "vaccine". From auto immune issues to a compromised blood brain barrier that allows things through that shouldn't be, which can lead to a plethora of neurological issues.
5, 10, 20 years from now people may have a name for these illnesses: Fauci Syndrome.
In fact, this may actually be the true biological warfare intent of the virus. Create a virus where the thing you use to identify it, is the thing that will cause the most long lasting harm, so that when your enemy tries to vaccinate against it, they are effectively trojan horsing themselves. The long term side effects could effectively cripple the populace.
Just curious, where did you get that the spikes encoded by RNA vaccines become integrated into the external membrane of host cells? I've just read that they encode the spike, but not where they go (such that some are excreted and detected in plasma and then detected everywhere, I assumed).
Also never heard that this was related to passing the blood brain barrier. If true, whether the artificial spikes get attached to something else in the blood and allow improper BBB penetration is important. But going on the past comment that you said they will be on the extracellular surface of cells, it does not seem likely that entire cells would migrate into the brain. My understanding is the spike allows binding to cellular membranes and entry by endocytosis. In general, that is something we should study more before allowing in a vaccine. Might be many things that could go wrong if it gets mixed up with the wrong proteins at the wrong place, but I'm unsure what about the BBB is a particular risk.
Nov 27 2020: mRna, “Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?” https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine-permanently-alter-my-dna/
I think a lot of things can potentially go wrong, though to me some of the ideas in the blog seem less likely than most speculation.
The idea that vaccine RNA can be integrated by endogenous retroviruses is very unlikely, I think. If I remember right, only one family has activity in humans. HERV-K appears to be the only active one. Usually in cancer, or as the link suggested, stem cells (though to what degree in stem cells I'm not sure). Mainly, RNA induced expression systems are used in induced-pluripotent stem cells very often. The expression invariably remains transient, even when researchers don't like it to. Researchers likely would have noticed this, even by accident, at this point, and the experiments have been done to trillions of cells for different experiments over years.
Actually, one reason why this may not happen relates to one of the things I consider a cause to worry about side effects. When your cells is infected with RNA, part of the immune response is the destruction of that cell. It's not all just an antibody-based immunity. Presumably, a cell permanently expressing the spike antigen will be eventually destroyed. The bad thing about that idea is the random cell destruction that occurs could be harmful in a variety of ways.
The other idea about splicing into another virus that was infecting the same cell is beyond my expertise, but I haven't heard of viruses co-opting other elements that are not a stable part of the genome. It could be a freak accident occurrence, but IMO far less likely than the other things that go wrong.